• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comfortable speech listening levels: effects of competition and instruction.

作者信息

Beattie R C

出版信息

Am J Otol. 1982 Jan;3(3):192-9.

PMID:7055233
Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the effects of a background four=falker babble on the comfortable loudness level (CLL) for speech (California Consonant Test stimuli) using three sets of instructions. Three groups of twelve normal-hearing subjects each were tested using an adjustment psychophysical method. Each group received one of three sets of instructions, which were selected to sample the lower limit, most comfortable, or upper limit of the CLL range. Speech CLLs were initially obtained in quiet, then in the presence of four levels of competition (50 to 80 dB SPL, or 70 to 100 dB SPL), and finally in quiet again. Very similar means were found for the two quiet conditions for all instructions, indicating that the intervening four-talker conditions did not alter the final quiet CLL. The four-talker babble resulted in very substantial CLL shifts fro the lower limit instructions, although relatively little effect was observed on the upper limit of the CLL range. These differential effects were reflected as a systematic reduction in th CLL range with increasing competition levels. Whereas there was approximately 60-dB CLL range when the lower and upper limits were measured in quiet, introduction of the 80-dB SPL competition reduced this range to 16 dB. These data raise questions as to which instructions are most appropriate when CLLs are used to select and evaluate hearing aids, and how much, if any, background competition should be employed when making these measurements.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comfortable speech listening levels: effects of competition and instruction.
Am J Otol. 1982 Jan;3(3):192-9.
2
An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.核24型人工耳蜗植入系统输入电平范围的研究:言语感知性能、程序偏好及响度舒适度评级
Ear Hear. 2003 Apr;24(2):157-74. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000058107.64929.D6.
3
Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.言语舒适响度水平:信噪比和指令的影响
J Aud Res. 1984 Jul;24(3):213-29.
4
Effects of a competing message on the speech comfortable loudness level for two instructional sets.一条竞争信息对两种教学集的言语舒适响度水平的影响。
Ear Hear. 1980 Sep-Oct;1(5):242-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198009000-00003.
5
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
6
Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.刺激水平对使用人工耳蜗或数字助听器的儿童言语感知能力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):493-507. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000234635.48564.ce.
7
Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
J Aud Res. 1982 Jan;22(1):71-6.
8
Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.正常听力和听力受损成年人的听觉稳态反应及单词识别分数
Ear Hear. 2004 Feb;25(1):68-84. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000111545.71693.48.
9
Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
J Am Audiol Soc. 1979 Jan-Feb;4(4):152-6.
10
The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.增加辅音/元音强度比对言语响度的影响。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987 Fall;24(4):221-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The master hearing aid.主助听器。
Trends Amplif. 2013 Jun;17(2):108-34. doi: 10.1177/1084713813486851. Epub 2013 May 17.