Gorog R H, Hakim M K, Thompson N W, Rigg G A, McCann D S
Clin Chem. 1982 Jan;28(1):87-91.
We compared serum parathyrin radioimmunoassay data obtained with five commercially available kits for normal subjects, patients on dialysis, and patients with hyperparathyroidism. The Cambridge Nuclear kit gave low results, did not distinguish the dialysis-group sera from the normal sera, and had the greatest CV (56%) both inter- and intra-assay. The Immuno Nuclear PTH-II kit gave more satisfactory clinical data than their PTH-C-terminal kit; however, as with most procedures involving a substantial and variable nonspecific binding correction for each serum, parallelism between samples and the standard curve was poor, turnaround time slow, and inter-assay CV high (39%). Unlike the other kits, the Nichols and the Iso-Tex products depend on a direct methodology; they displayed good parallelism and distinguished among our three populations. A Scatchard plot of results with the Nichols kit was closest to the ideal linear model; the Iso-Tex kit had the shortest turnaround time.
我们比较了使用五种市售试剂盒获得的正常受试者、透析患者和甲状旁腺功能亢进患者的血清甲状旁腺素放射免疫分析数据。剑桥核公司的试剂盒结果偏低,无法区分透析组血清和正常血清,且批内和批间变异系数(CV)最大(56%)。免疫核公司的PTH-II试剂盒比其PTH-C末端试剂盒提供了更令人满意的临床数据;然而,与大多数对每份血清进行大量可变非特异性结合校正的方法一样,样品与标准曲线之间的平行性较差,周转时间长,批间CV高(39%)。与其他试剂盒不同,Nichols和Iso-Tex产品采用直接方法;它们显示出良好的平行性,并且能够区分我们的三类人群。使用Nichols试剂盒得到的结果绘制的Scatchard图最接近理想线性模型;Iso-Tex试剂盒的周转时间最短。