Forrester R L
J Clin Psychol. 1982 Jan;38(1):221-5.
Administered the Rotter I-E scale to 135 psychiatric disability petitioners in connection with their clinical evaluation for the Social Security Administration. Internal vs. External Locus of Control (I-E), Personal Locus of Control (PLC) subscale, and Sociopolitical Locus of Control (SLC) subscale scores were analyzed with respect to diagnostic groups. While no significant differences were found among the diagnostic groups for I-E or PLC subscale scores, SLC subscale scores were significantly different (p less than .02), with externality inversely related to degree of impairment. The report concludes that the disability petitioners, especially the less impaired, see themselves in adversarial relationships with sociopolitical forces, i.e., the Social Security Administration, with this attitude reflected in the SLC subscale scores.
针对社会保障管理局的临床评估，对135名申请精神疾病残疾的人进行了罗特内外控量表测试。就诊断组而言，分析了内控与外控（I-E）、个人控制源（PLC）子量表以及社会政治控制源（SLC）子量表的得分。虽然在诊断组之间，I-E或PLC子量表得分未发现显著差异，但SLC子量表得分存在显著差异（p小于0.02），外控与损伤程度呈负相关。报告得出结论，申请残疾的人，尤其是损伤较轻的人，认为自己与社会政治力量，即社会保障管理局，处于对抗关系，这种态度反映在SLC子量表得分中。
