Thompson K C, Todorovic R A, Mateus G, Adams L G
Trop Anim Health Prod. 1978 Aug;10(3):141-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02235326.
The results of the immune responses of immunised and chemoprophylactically treated calves to tick-borne (Boophilus microplus) challenge indicate that the system of immunisation was effective in protecting cattle against Anaplasma marginale, Babesia argentina (bovis), and B. bigemina. However, chemoprophylaxis was effective only against Babesia spp. but not against A. marginale. Both methods showed a substantial advantage over no control system when using native cattle breeds in a zone endemic for bovine anaplasmosis and babesiosis. Based on the net economic gain per calf starting the experiment, sizeable differences were noted at 308 days between the calves in the immunised group, chemoprophylaxis group, tick and gastrointestinal parasite control group and the experiment control group.
免疫和化学预防处理的犊牛对蜱传播(微小牛蜱)攻击的免疫反应结果表明,免疫系统能有效保护牛免受边缘无浆体、阿根廷巴贝斯虫(牛巴贝斯虫)和双芽巴贝斯虫感染。然而,化学预防仅对巴贝斯虫属有效,对边缘无浆体无效。在牛无浆体病和巴贝斯虫病的地方流行区使用本地牛品种时,这两种方法都比无控制系统具有显著优势。根据实验开始时每头犊牛的净经济收益,在308天时,免疫组、化学预防组、蜱和胃肠道寄生虫控制组与实验对照组的犊牛之间存在显著差异。