Reply to Rathbun and Smith: who made the Hooper blooper?
作者信息
Boyd J L
出版信息
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;50(2):284-5.
PMID:7069034
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Rathbun and Smith: who made the Hooper blooper?对拉特本和史密斯的回应：是谁犯了胡珀的错误？
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;50(2):284-5.
2
Comment on the validity of Boyd's Validation Study of the Hooper Visual Organization Test.对博伊德关于胡珀视觉组织测试的效度验证研究的评论。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982 Apr;50(2):281-3.
3
[Subjective health state and brain damage].[主观健康状况与脑损伤]
Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol. 1980;188(3):316-30.
4
[Epilepsy between neurology and psychiatry].
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1981 Nov;33(11):652-6.
5
Determining neuropsychological "strengths" and "weaknesses" on the Luria-Nebraska: good practice or wishful thinking?基于鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验确定神经心理学的“优势”与“劣势”：是良好实践还是一厢情愿？
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984 Aug;52(4):695-6.
6
"It's what you mean, not what you say": pragmatic language use in brain-damaged patients.
Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1988;66:229-43.
7
[Effect of the position and size of the postoperative brain defect on psychological outcome].[术后脑缺损的位置和大小对心理结局的影响]
Zentralbl Neurochir. 1988;49(4):298-309.
8
Effectiveness of an attention-training program.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1987 Apr;9(2):117-30. doi: 10.1080/01688638708405352.
9
[Differences in the evaluation of child behavior disorders between various reference persons].[不同参考人对儿童行为障碍评估的差异]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1985;79(23):1018-20.
10
[Neuropsychological diagnosis of organic cerebral impairment: limits and possibilities (author's transl)].[器质性脑损伤的神经心理学诊断：局限与可能性（作者译）]
Nervenarzt. 1981 Nov;52(11):649-54.
Zotero 插件