Borow K M, Newburger J W
Am Heart J. 1982 May;103(5):879-86. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(82)90403-3.
Brachial artery pressures determined by the oscillometric method were compared with simultaneous central aortic (Ao) pressure measurements in 30 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Three simultaneous oscillometric and central Ao pressure readings were obtained in each patient. Central Ao pressures ranged widely for systolic (SP) (98 to 177 mm Hg), diastolic (DP) (41 to 97 mm Hg), and mean (MP) (60 to 120 mm Hg) pressure values. The mean percent errors (pressure difference divided by central Ao pressure) and "within subject" standard deviation were 1% and 3% for SP, 2% and 4% for DP, and -3% and 7% for MP. The percent error in oscillometric SP and DP estimates was not significantly influenced by cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, heart rate, body surface area, or left ventricular ejection fraction. The oscillometric method provides accurate, reproducible, and convenient estimates of central Ao SP and DP and may be particularly useful when indirect blood pressure measurements are required for the noninvasive assessment of left ventricular function in patients without aortic stenosis.
在30例接受心导管检查的患者中,将示波法测定的肱动脉血压与同步测量的中心主动脉(Ao)压力进行了比较。每位患者同时获得3次示波法和中心Ao压力读数。中心Ao压力的收缩压(SP)(98至177毫米汞柱)、舒张压(DP)(41至97毫米汞柱)和平均压(MP)(60至120毫米汞柱)值范围广泛。SP的平均百分比误差(压力差除以中心Ao压力)和“受试者内”标准差分别为1%和3%,DP为2%和4%,MP为-3%和7%。示波法对SP和DP估计值的百分比误差不受心脏指数、全身血管阻力、心率、体表面积或左心室射血分数的显著影响。示波法可提供准确、可重复且便捷的中心Ao的SP和DP估计值,对于无主动脉瓣狭窄的患者在无创评估左心室功能需要间接测量血压时可能特别有用。