Peevy K J, Grant P H, Hoff C J
Am J Dis Child. 1982 Apr;136(4):357-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970400075019.
Sixty paired venous and capillary total neutrophil counts (TNCs) were obtained from 30 healthy, term neonates on days 1 and 2 of life. Day 1 venous TNC (8,200 +/-- 3,800/cu mm) and capillary TNC (10,400 +/- 4,400/cu mm) were significantly different when examined by the paired t test as were day 2 venous TNC (8,700 +/- 3,300/cu mm) and capillary TNC (9,800 +/- 3,400/cu mm). Application of published reference ranges for capillary TNC to paired samples revealed a 35% incidence of differing clinical interpretations between paired TNCs. The application of capillary reference ranges to venous TNC may result in frequent misdiagnoses and inappropriate management. Venous reference ranges should be established.
从30名健康足月新生儿出生后第1天和第2天获取了60对静脉血和毛细血管血的总中性粒细胞计数(TNC)。通过配对t检验发现,第1天静脉血TNC(8200±3800/立方毫米)与毛细血管血TNC(10400±4400/立方毫米)有显著差异,第2天静脉血TNC(8700±3300/立方毫米)与毛细血管血TNC(9800±3400/立方毫米)也有显著差异。将已发表的毛细血管血TNC参考范围应用于配对样本时,发现配对TNC之间临床解读不同的发生率为35%。将毛细血管血参考范围应用于静脉血TNC可能会导致频繁误诊和不恰当的处理。应建立静脉血参考范围。