Benditt D G, Epstein M L, Arentzen C E, Kriett J M, Klein G J
Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7):1474-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.1474.
We studied the electrophysiologic characteristics of atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction in patients with reciprocating tachycardia (RT) without ventricular preexcitation, and the relation of these characteristics to RT cycle length (CL). Thirty-five symptomatic patients who had a normal PR interval (0.13-0.20 second) during sinus rhythm underwent detailed intracardiac electrophysiologic study during which ventricular preexcitation was excluded, and the RT mechanism was determined. RT was due to reentry using an accessory AV pathway capable of conduction only in the retrograde direction (concealed AP) in 13 patients (37%) and to reentry within the AV node in 22 (63%). Dynamic properties of AV conduction (assessed by degree of AH prolongation during progressive increase in atrial pacing rate) were normally distributed (p less then 0.005); 12 patients (34%) fulfilled the criteria for enhanced AV conduction (EAVC). The patients with EAVC had a shorter RT CL than did patients without EAVC (294 +/- 43.3 msec vs 360 +/- 68.1 msec, p less than 0.01). However, CL differences were primarily due to the influence of EAVC in the subgroup of patients with RT using a concealed AP (EAVC CL, 274 +/- 35.1 msec; without EAVC, 326 +/- 15.7 msec, p less than 0.005). The RT CL in patients with reentry within AV node was not measureable influenced by concomitant EAVC (EAVC, 314 +/- 43.8 msec; without EAVC, 376 +/- 76.8 msec) (NS). This study suggests that despite the presence of a normal PR interval during sinus rhythm, dynamic AV conduction responses can vary widely in patients with RT. In patients with RT using a concealed AP, but not in those with reentry within the AV node, coexisting diminished physiologic AV conduction slowing may be associated with more rapid tachycardia rates.
我们研究了无室性预激的折返性心动过速(RT)患者的房室(AV)结传导电生理特征,以及这些特征与RT心动周期长度(CL)的关系。35例在窦性心律时PR间期正常(0.13 - 0.20秒)的有症状患者接受了详细的心内电生理研究,在此期间排除了室性预激,并确定了RT机制。13例患者(37%)的RT是由于使用仅能逆向传导的房室旁道(隐匿性AP)进行折返,22例(63%)是由于在房室结内折返。AV传导的动态特性(通过心房起搏频率逐渐增加时AH延长程度评估)呈正态分布(p小于0.005);12例患者(34%)符合增强型AV传导(EAVC)标准。有EAVC的患者RT CL比无EAVC的患者短(294 ± 43.3毫秒对360 ± 68.1毫秒,p小于0.01)。然而,CL差异主要是由于EAVC对使用隐匿性AP的RT患者亚组的影响(EAVC时CL,274 ± 35.1毫秒;无EAVC时,326 ± 15.7毫秒,p小于0.005)。房室结内折返患者的RT CL不受伴发的EAVC影响(EAVC时,314 ± 43.8毫秒;无EAVC时,376 ± 76.8毫秒)(无显著性差异)。本研究表明,尽管窦性心律时PR间期正常,但RT患者的动态AV传导反应可能差异很大。在使用隐匿性AP的RT患者中,而非房室结内折返的患者中,并存的生理性AV传导减慢减弱可能与更快的心动过速速率相关。