• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帕克诉切辛案:“错误出生”理论的司法持续发展

Park v. Chessin: the continuing judicial development of the theory of "wrongful life".

作者信息

Cohen M E

出版信息

Am J Law Med. 1978 Summer;4(2):211-32.

PMID:707493
Abstract

Park v. Chessin, a recent New York case, marked the first step toward judicial acceptance of the theory of "wrongful life." Wrongful life suits involve a cause of action brought by an infant, against a physician, alleging that the physician's failure to inform the child's parents of the possibility of their bearing a severely defective child was the proximate cause of the infant's birth, and thus resulted in harm to the infant. This Note explores recent legal developments that give precedential support to the development of the theory of wrongful life. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the awarding of monetary damages is an appropriate remedy for the wrongful life plaintiff, and it examines possible methods for measuring those damages. The Note concludes with an analysis of the capability of courts to adjudicate wrongful life suits, and of the possible ramifications of judicial acceptance of the theory of wrongful life.

摘要

帕克诉切辛案是纽约近期的一个案例,标志着司法界迈向接受“错误出生”理论的第一步。“错误出生”诉讼是指婴儿对医生提起的诉讼,指控医生未能告知孩子的父母其生育严重缺陷婴儿的可能性,这是婴儿出生的直接原因,从而给婴儿造成了伤害。本注释探讨了近期的法律发展,这些发展为“错误出生”理论的发展提供了先例支持。此外,它表明判给金钱赔偿是对“错误出生”原告的适当补救措施,并研究了衡量这些损害赔偿的可能方法。本注释最后分析了法院裁决“错误出生”诉讼的能力,以及司法界接受“错误出生”理论可能产生的影响。

相似文献

1
Park v. Chessin: the continuing judicial development of the theory of "wrongful life".帕克诉切辛案:“错误出生”理论的司法持续发展
Am J Law Med. 1978 Summer;4(2):211-32.
2
The concept of wrongful life in the law.法律中的错误生命概念。
Women Health. 1983 Spring;8(1):81-7. doi: 10.1300/J013v08n01_10.
3
Wrongful life and a fundamental right to be born healthy: Park v. Chessin; Becker v. Schwartz.不当出生之诉与健康出生的基本权利:帕克诉切辛案;贝克尔诉施瓦茨案
Buffalo Law Rev. 1978 Summer;27(3):537-61.
4
Torts of wrongful birth and wrongful life: a review.不当出生与不当生命侵权行为综述
Am J Med Genet. 1986 Sep;25(1):71-80. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250109.
5
Wrongful life: impaired infant's cause of action recognized--Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories.
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev. 1980;1980(3):676-83.
6
Wrongful life, wrongful birth, and wrongful pregnancy: judicial divergence in the birth-related torts.错误生命、错误出生和错误怀孕:出生相关侵权行为中的司法分歧。
Forum. 1985 Winter;20(2):207-21.
7
Curlender v. Bio-Science Laboratories: a rational step toward judicial recognition of wrongful life.柯伦德诉生物科学实验室案:迈向司法承认错误生命之诉的合理一步。
Oklahoma Law Rev. 1981 Summer;34(3):614-25.
8
Wrongful life lawsuits gain acceptance in courts.错误出生诉讼在法庭上得到认可。
Ob Gyn News. 1982;17(22):1, 43.
9
Turpin v. Sortini: recognizing the unsupportable cause of action for wrongful life.特平诉索尔蒂尼案:对不当生命不可支持的诉讼理由的认定。
Calif Law Rev. 1983 Jul;71(4):1278-97.
10
The risk of birth defects: Jacobs v. Theimer and parents' right to know.出生缺陷的风险:雅各布斯诉泰默案与父母的知情权。
Am J Law Med. 1976;2(2):213-43.