Suppr超能文献

Lippes Loop D型宫内节育器与锥形Lippes Loop D型宫内节育器的比较。

Comparison of the Lippes Loop D and tapered Lippes Loop D intrauterine devices.

作者信息

Behlilovic B, Etman S, Laufe L E, Dixon B

出版信息

Contraception. 1982 Mar;25(3):293-8. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(82)90052-x.

Abstract

The tapered Lippes Loop D (LLD) is compared to the standard LLD to evaluate efficacy and termination events. The tapered device was designed with the intention of lowering the expulsion rate below the rate for women with standard Lippes Loops. The two devices were randomly assigned to 989 women in two studies. Expulsion rates for the tapered device were lower at six months (p less than 0.10) and at 12 months (p less than 0.05). When the women were divided into groups by uterine measurement, the differences continued to be significant for women with larger uteri but not for those with smaller uteri. Comparison of other pertinent event rates showed no significant differences. Analysis of the data indicates that the tapered LLD represents an improvement in expulsion rates over the standard LLD.

摘要

将锥形Lippes环D(LLD)与标准LLD进行比较,以评估其有效性和终止事件。设计锥形装置的目的是将其排出率降低到低于使用标准Lippes环的女性的排出率。在两项研究中,这两种装置被随机分配给989名女性。锥形装置在6个月时(p小于0.10)和12个月时(p小于0.05)的排出率较低。当根据子宫测量值将女性分为几组时,对于子宫较大的女性,差异仍然显著,但对于子宫较小的女性则不显著。其他相关事件率的比较未显示出显著差异。数据分析表明,与标准LLD相比,锥形LLD在排出率方面有所改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验