Farr G, Amatya R, Acosta M, Ekwempu C, Kisninci H
Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
Contraception. 1995 Jul;52(1):17-22. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00119-u.
The clinical performance of the Copper T 380A (TCu 380A) and the Lippes Loop intrauterine devices (IUDs) were evaluated for 12 months in a group of 710 women who had one of the two IUDs inserted. Results are from a randomized clinical trial conducted at three collaborating research sites located in three developing countries. The gross cumulative life-table pregnancy rate of the TCu 380A IUD was found to be lower than that of the Lippes Loop IUD at 12 months (0.7 and 2.1 per women, respectively). Although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.25), it is similar to findings from other studies. The 12-month cumulative removal rate due to personal reasons was significantly different (1.4 and 0.0, respectively, p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences between the two study IUDs were not found with regard to IUD expulsion or IUD removal due to bleeding/pain, medical reasons, planned pregnancy or investigator's choice. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.03) was observed in the number of TCu 380A IUD users experiencing dysmenorrhea (26.1%) during the 12-month study period, compared to Lippes Loop IUD users (18.8%).
对710名插入铜T 380A(TCu 380A)或利普斯环宫内节育器(IUD)的女性进行了为期12个月的宫内节育器临床表现评估。研究结果来自于在三个发展中国家的三个合作研究地点进行的一项随机临床试验。12个月时,发现TCu 380A宫内节育器的总累积生命表妊娠率低于利普斯环宫内节育器(分别为每名女性0.7例和2.1例)。虽然这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.25),但与其他研究结果相似。因个人原因导致的12个月累积取出率有显著差异(分别为1.4和0.0,p = 0.05)。在宫内节育器排出或因出血/疼痛、医学原因、计划妊娠或研究者选择而取出宫内节育器方面,未发现两种研究用宫内节育器之间存在统计学显著差异。在12个月的研究期内,与使用利普斯环宫内节育器的女性(18.8%)相比,使用TCu 380A宫内节育器且出现痛经的女性数量存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.03)(26.1%)。