Moses M J, Poorman P A, Roderick T H, Davisson M T
Chromosoma. 1982;84(4):457-74. doi: 10.1007/BF00292848.
Two paracentric inversions in the mouse, In (1) 1 Rk and In (2) 5 Rk, have been studied in surface microspreads of spermatocytes from heterozygotes. At zytogene, synaptic initiation occurs independently in three regions: within the inversion, and without, on either side. Synaptonemal complex (SC) formation is restricted to homologous regions, resulting in inversion loops in all early pachytene spermatocytes. An adjusting phase then occurs during pachytene in which the inversion loop is reduced by desynapsis of homologously synapsed SC, followed immediately by non-homologous synapsis with the alternate pairing partner, progressing from the ends toward the middle. Adjustment occurs during the first half of pachytene, but is not closely synchronized with sub-stage. It is complete by late pachytene, the loop having been eliminated in all cases and replaced by "straight" SCs in which the inverted region is heterosynapsis. Synapsis in the adjustment phase is evidently permitted only after the homosynaptic phase, and is indifferent to homology. It may lead to hetersynapsis, as in the inversion region, or to synapsis of homologous regions not synapsed at zytogene. The anaphase bridge frequency, a measure of crossing over within the inversion, is about 34% for both inversions studied, indicating that such crossovers do not block adjustment, that crossing over probably occurs before or during the adjustment period, and that there is some crossover suppression. The last could be the consequence of blocking by desynapsis/heterosynapsis. Synaptic adjustment appears to be a general phenomenon that occurs to varying extents in different forms. A hypothetical scheme for two phases of synapsis is proposed: at zytogene, a basic propensity for indifferent SC formation is limited by a restricting condition to synapsis between homologous regions, Subsequently, the restriction is lifted, whereupon synaptic instability is resolved by desynapsis, followed by resynapsis that is indifferent to homology, but that results in a topologically more stable structure.
对小鼠中的两个臂内倒位,即In(1)1Rk和In(2)5Rk,在杂合子精母细胞的表面微铺展中进行了研究。在偶线期,突触起始在三个区域独立发生:倒位区内以及倒位区两侧的非倒位区。联会复合体(SC)的形成局限于同源区域,导致所有早粗线期精母细胞中出现倒位环。然后在粗线期会出现一个调整阶段,在此期间,通过同源联会的SC的解联会,倒位环缩小,紧接着与交替配对的伙伴进行非同源联会,从末端向中间推进。调整发生在粗线期的前半段,但与亚阶段并不同步紧密。在晚粗线期完成,在所有情况下环都已消除,取而代之的是“直的”SC,其中倒位区域是异源联会。调整阶段的联会显然仅在同源联会阶段之后才被允许,并且对同源性不敏感。它可能导致异源联会,如在倒位区域,或者导致在偶线期未联会的同源区域联会。后期桥频率是倒位区内交叉互换的一个指标,所研究的两个倒位的后期桥频率约为34%,这表明这种交叉互换不会阻碍调整,交叉互换可能发生在调整期之前或期间,并且存在一些交叉互换抑制。最后一点可能是解联会/异源联会阻碍的结果。突触调整似乎是一种普遍现象,在不同形式中以不同程度发生。提出了一个关于联会两个阶段的假设方案:在偶线期,无差异SC形成的基本倾向受到同源区域之间联会的限制条件的限制,随后,这种限制被解除,于是通过解联会解决突触不稳定性,接着是对同源性不敏感的重新联会,但会导致拓扑结构更稳定的结构。