Suppr超能文献

接受治疗的法庭转介和非法庭转介男性酗酒者的饮酒模式差异、人格特征及现场表达

Differential drinking patterns, personality characteristics, and field articulation of court-referred and non-court-referred male alcoholics in treatment.

作者信息

Calsyn D A, Reynolds F D, O'Leary M R, Walker R D

出版信息

Int J Addict. 1982 Feb;17(2):249-57. doi: 10.3109/10826088209071009.

Abstract

Male alcoholics in an inpatient rehabilitation program were selected to investigate differential characteristics of court-referred patients on measures of personality, drinking style, demograhics, and cognitive style. Seventy-eight males were separated into two groups based upon the demographic dimension of whether or not the patient was in treatment primarily as a result of legal pressures imposed due to alcohol-related motor vehicle violation (N = 23) or in treatment for a variety of personal/nonlegal reasons (N = 57). All subjects were administered the Clinical Analysis Questionnaire (CAQ), the Alcohol Use Inventory (AUI), and the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT). There were no differences found on any of the personality or demographic measures. There were significant differences between the legal and nonlegal groups on 11 of the 20 AUI scales. The legal group tended to be more field dependent than the nonlegal group as measured by the GEFT. The legal group does not appear to suffer as severely from the effects of alcohol as does the nonlegal group and may be in an earlier stage of problem drinking.

摘要

选取了参加住院康复项目的男性酗酒者,以调查因法庭转介而来的患者在人格、饮酒方式、人口统计学特征和认知方式等方面的差异特点。78名男性根据以下人口统计学维度被分为两组:患者接受治疗主要是由于与酒精相关的机动车违规行为所施加的法律压力(N = 23),还是出于各种个人/非法律原因接受治疗(N = 57)。所有受试者都接受了临床分析问卷(CAQ)、酒精使用量表(AUI)和团体镶嵌图形测验(GEFT)。在任何人格或人口统计学指标上均未发现差异。在AUI的20个量表中,有11个量表显示法律组和非法律组之间存在显著差异。根据GEFT测量,法律组比非法律组更倾向于场依存型。法律组似乎不像非法律组那样受到酒精影响的严重程度,可能处于问题饮酒的早期阶段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验