Fraser A, Wilcox K, Storgion S
Percept Mot Skills. 1982 Apr;54(2):343-55. doi: 10.2466/pms.1982.54.2.343.
A new visual illusion, filling-in illusion, is reported and compared to the moving visual phantoms of Tynan and Sekuler (1975). 169 unrelated, unpaid, volunteer subjects were recruited from students and faculty and classified as filling-in positive--able to perceive the illusion, or filling-in negative--unable to perceive it. Other investigations examined the effects of light levels, moving vs static test figures, and black-and-white vs shaded figures. A polaroid study suggests a central rather than retinal location of the illusory effect. Filling-in is a contour completion effect, as are moving visual phantoms. Although a number of differences between the two phenomena exist, it is suggested that they may be due to different aspects of a common mechanism.
本文报告了一种新的视觉错觉——填充错觉，并将其与泰南和塞库勒（1975年）的移动视觉幻影进行了比较。从学生和教师中招募了169名无关联、无报酬的志愿者受试者，并将他们分为填充阳性——能够感知错觉，或填充阴性——无法感知错觉。其他研究考察了光照水平、动态与静态测试图形以及黑白图形与阴影图形的影响。一项宝丽来研究表明，错觉效应的位置在中央而非视网膜。填充是一种轮廓完成效应，移动视觉幻影也是如此。尽管这两种现象存在一些差异，但有人认为它们可能是由于共同机制的不同方面造成的。
