Maisto S A, Sobell L C, Cooper A M, Sobell M B
Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90022-3.
Two different interview techniques, used to obtain retrospective reports of daily drinking behavior from alcohol abusers, were empirically evaluated for degree of consistency. Fifteen male alcohol abusers receiving outpatient treatment for alcohol problems participated in two different studies: an alcohol treatment outcome study conducted by the Rand Corporation, and an evaluation of the reliability and validity of a time-line follow-back interview technique. The degree of consistency of self-reports of certain demographic information as well as drinking and related behaviors occurring 30 days pretreatment was evaluated Correlational and scatterplot analyses showed a moderate to high degree of agreement between the two data sources, leading confidence to the information obtained from each of the interview methods. Limits on the generalizability of these findings are discussed.
为评估一致性程度,对用于从酗酒者那里获取每日饮酒行为回顾性报告的两种不同访谈技术进行了实证评估。15名因酒精问题接受门诊治疗的男性酗酒者参与了两项不同研究:一项由兰德公司开展的酒精治疗结果研究,以及一项对时间线追溯访谈技术的信效度评估。对某些人口统计学信息的自我报告以及治疗前30天内饮酒及相关行为的一致性程度进行了评估。相关性分析和散点图分析表明,两个数据源之间存在中度到高度的一致性,这使人们对从每种访谈方法中获得的信息有信心。讨论了这些研究结果可推广性的局限性。