Cooper J, Ciuffreda K J, Kruger P B
Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jun;66(6):398-404. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.6.398.
Objective infrared recording devices were used to measure simultaneously and continuously both accommodation and accommodative vergence to near stimuli in 4 subjects with intermittent exotropia of the divergence-excess type (2 simulated and 2 true). In addition standard clinically determined stimulus accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratios were measured. Results showed the mean group response AC/C ratio to be 5.9/1 (range 4.5-8.0/1) with no differences between true and simulated divergence-excess. Similar AC/A ratios were found after 45 minutes of monocular occlusion. Our results clearly demonstrate relatively normal response AC/A ratios in these subjects. Thus, contrary to what is believed by many clinicians, the reduced ocular deviation at near compared with distance vision cannot be attributed primarily to an abnormally high AC/A ratio. We believe than fusional convergence after-effects and/or proximal convergence effects contribute to inflate the clinically determined stimulus AC/A ratios.
使用客观红外记录设备,对4例散开过强型间歇性外斜视患者(2例模拟病例和2例真实病例)同时连续测量其对近刺激的调节和调节性集合。此外,还测量了标准临床测定的刺激调节性集合与调节(AC/A)比值。结果显示,该组平均反应性AC/C比值为5.9/1(范围4.5 - 8.0/1),真实病例与模拟散开过强病例之间无差异。单眼遮挡45分钟后发现了类似的AC/A比值。我们的结果清楚地表明,这些受试者的反应性AC/A比值相对正常。因此,与许多临床医生的看法相反,与远距离视力相比,近距离时眼位偏斜减小不能主要归因于异常高的AC/A比值。我们认为,融合性集合后效和/或近距离集合效应导致临床测定的刺激AC/A比值升高。