A comparison of several published methods for analysing plasma protein turnover data has been undertaken, with particular reference to rapidly metabolized proteins such as members of the complement series. 2. With the exception of the equilibrium time method, most methods proved adequate for the determination of overall fractional catabolic rates. A further exception is that the renal clearance method becomes invalid when the fractional catabolic rate approaches the renal iodide clearance, but this may be the method of choice for slowly metabolized proteins if accurate urine collections can be ensured. 3. For the measurement of the ratio of extra to intra-vascular protein pool size a clear preference emerged for the method of C. M. E. Matthews (1957, Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2, 36-53). For rapidly metabolized proteins the calculations must be preceded by a correction for the non-protein bound iodide retained in the intra- and extra-vascular spaces. 4. The accurate calculation of fractional catabolic rate in the extravascular pool generally requires more experimental data than are commonly collected as well as an accurate correction for non-protein bound label that remains unexcreted. Only two techniques hold promise of accurate results: Nosslin's rate equations method and a development of Vitek's deconvolution method described herein. Nosslin's integrated rate equations method is particularly affected by systematic errors in renal iodide clearance estimates and should probably not be further used for this purpose.
摘要
我们对几种已发表的分析血浆蛋白周转数据的方法进行了比较,特别参考了补体系列等快速代谢的蛋白质。2. 除平衡时间法外,大多数方法证明足以测定总体分解代谢率分数。另一个例外是,当分解代谢率分数接近肾碘清除率时,肾清除率法会失效,但如果能确保准确收集尿液,对于缓慢代谢的蛋白质,这可能是首选方法。3. 对于血管外与血管内蛋白池大小比例的测量,人们明显更倾向于C. M. E. 马修斯(1957年,《医学与生物学中的物理学》,第2卷,第36 - 53页)的方法。对于快速代谢的蛋白质,在计算之前必须对血管内和血管外空间中保留的非蛋白结合碘进行校正。4. 血管外池中分解代谢率分数的准确计算通常需要比通常收集的更多的实验数据,以及对未排泄的非蛋白结合标记进行准确校正。只有两种技术有望获得准确结果:诺斯林的速率方程法和本文所述的维特反褶积法的改进方法。诺斯林的积分速率方程法特别受肾碘清除率估计中的系统误差影响,可能不应再用于此目的。