• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.

作者信息

Abel S M, Alberti P W, Haythornthwaite C, Riko K

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Mar;71(3):708-15. doi: 10.1121/1.387547.

DOI:10.1121/1.387547
PMID:7085974
Abstract

This research investigated the effect of car protectors on the intelligibility of speech in noise. Listeners with normal hearing, high-frequency, and flat loss were tested. Half the subjects in each group were fluent in English and half-poorly conversant. Taped lists of 25 words were presented free field under conditions defined by the speech-to-noise ratio, spectrum of noise background, and presence of ear protection. The results showed that intelligibility decreased with speech-to-noise ratio and was poorer in crowd noise than in white noise. The protector had no effect for the normal listener, but caused a substantial decrement in those with impairment. In all groups nonfluency contributed an additional loss of 10% to 20%. Significant differences in performance were noted for different muff and plug types.

摘要

相似文献

1
Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Mar;71(3):708-15. doi: 10.1121/1.387547.
2
Speech intelligibility in noise with ear protectors.佩戴听力保护器时在噪声环境中的言语清晰度。
J Otolaryngol. 1980 Jun;9(3):256-65.
3
Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.言语可懂度与被动、水平依赖型耳塞。
Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):642-9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821478c8.
4
Application of the articulation index to the speech recognition of normal and impaired listeners wearing hearing protection.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Mar;87(3):1192-9. doi: 10.1121/1.398793.
5
The effect of ear protectors on word discrimination in subject with normal hearing and subjects with noise-induced hearing loss.耳塞对听力正常受试者和噪声性听力损失受试者言语辨别能力的影响。
J Am Aud Soc. 1979 Jul-Aug;5(1):11-6.
6
Intelligibility of foreign-accented speech for older adults with and without hearing loss.有听力损失和无听力损失的老年人对带有外国口音言语的可懂度。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Mar;21(3):153-62. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.3.3.
7
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.噪声环境下言语感知时的认知负荷:年龄、听力损失和认知对瞳孔反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
8
Effects of hearing protector devices on speech intelligibility: the importance of individualized assessment.护听器对言语可懂度的影响:个体化评估的重要性。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022 Jun;28(2):1227-1234. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1880763. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
9
Better-ear glimpsing at low frequencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.正常听力和听力受损听众在低频下对较好耳朵的瞥视。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Aug;140(2):1192. doi: 10.1121/1.4961006.
10
Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.正常听力和听力障碍者在安静和噪声环境下的言语可懂度建模。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Mar;127(3):1570-83. doi: 10.1121/1.3291000.

引用本文的文献

1
Noise-induced hearing loss and its prevention: Integration of data from animal models and human clinical trials.噪声性听力损失及其预防:动物模型和人类临床试验数据的整合。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):4051. doi: 10.1121/1.5132951.
2
Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.单侧听力损失:理解言语识别和定位变异性——对人工耳蜗植入候选资格的影响
Ear Hear. 2017 Mar/Apr;38(2):159-173. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000380.
3
A tentative proposal for classification of audiograms in noise-induced deafness: relationship between audiogram and subjective complaints in noise-exposed workers.
噪声性聋中听力图分类的初步建议:噪声暴露工人的听力图与主观症状之间的关系
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1986;57(3):173-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00405786.