Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠检查和内镜检查在盲肠和升结肠息肉样病变检测中的应用

Double-contrast barium-enema examination and endoscopy in the detection of polypoid lesions in the cecum and ascending colon.

作者信息

Thoeni R F, Petras A

出版信息

Radiology. 1982 Jul;144(2):257-60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.144.2.7089277.

Abstract

Fifty-three patients with 54 polypoid lesions in the ascending colon and cecum underwent colonoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination (DC-BE). Colonoscopy could not completely examine the cecum in three patients (failure rate 6%) and DC-BE had four false positive results. Colonoscopy detected 40 lesions (sensitivity 78%) and DC-BE 45 lesions (sensitivity 88%). A carcinoma and a villous adenoma were missed by both methods. The overall accuracy for colonoscopy was 80%, 76% if corrected for unsuccessful procedures; DC-BE showed accuracy rates of 82% and 83%. In combination, the two methods had 97% accuracy. This study shows that DC-BE is slightly better than colonoscopy for evaluating well-prepared patients with suspected polypoid lesions in the right colon, but stresses the complementary nature of the two methods and the need for repeating negative examinations by one modality in the presence of a positive result by the other.

摘要

53例升结肠和盲肠有54个息肉样病变的患者接受了结肠镜检查和双重对比钡灌肠检查(DC-BE)。3例患者结肠镜无法完全检查盲肠(失败率6%),DC-BE有4例假阳性结果。结肠镜检测到40个病变(敏感性78%),DC-BE检测到45个病变(敏感性88%)。两种方法均漏诊1例癌和1例绒毛状腺瘤。结肠镜检查的总体准确率为80%,若对不成功的检查进行校正则为76%;DC-BE的准确率分别为82%和83%。两种方法联合使用时准确率为97%。本研究表明,对于评估右结肠疑似息肉样病变且准备充分的患者,DC-BE略优于结肠镜检查,但强调了两种方法的互补性以及在一种检查结果为阳性时另一种检查结果为阴性的情况下重复阴性检查的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验