St Pierre R K, Fleming S S, Fleming L L
South Med J. 1982 Jul;75(7):827-35.
One hundred twelve consecutive fractures of the femoral diaphysis were treated in a prospective study at Grady Memorial Hospital, a designated trauma center, during the three-year period 1978 through 1980. Fifty of these were treated by closed intramedullary nailing; all united. Of the rest, 20 were treated by modified open intramedullary nailing, and 42 by cast-bracing. Closed intramedullary nailing offered a significant reduction in hospitalization and healing times compared to the other two methods; however, the high cost of equipment, along with the added cost of reoperation to remove the nail, rendered cast-bracing economically superior. Fractures treated by modified open intramedullary nailing developed no infections, but these patients lost significantly more blood during operation than those treated by closed nailing. Because of the decreased hospitalization and healing times, we prefer the closed intramedullary nailing technic for use in selected femoral fractures treated during the acute phase by an experienced surgical team.
1978年至1980年的三年间,在指定的创伤中心格雷迪纪念医院进行的一项前瞻性研究中,对112例股骨干连续性骨折进行了治疗。其中50例采用闭合髓内钉固定治疗,全部愈合。其余病例中,20例采用改良开放髓内钉固定治疗,42例采用石膏支具治疗。与其他两种方法相比,闭合髓内钉固定显著缩短了住院时间和愈合时间;然而,设备成本高昂,加上取出髓内钉的再次手术费用增加,使得石膏支具在经济上更具优势。采用改良开放髓内钉固定治疗的骨折未发生感染,但这些患者在手术期间的失血量明显多于采用闭合髓内钉固定治疗的患者。由于住院时间和愈合时间缩短,我们更倾向于由经验丰富的手术团队在急性期对选定的股骨骨折采用闭合髓内钉固定技术。