• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长对性教育的反对:借口还是现实?

Parental opposition to sex education: pretext or reality?

作者信息

Yarber W L

出版信息

Int J Health Educ. 1982;24(3):195-9.

PMID:7090579
Abstract

A major obstacle to the development of a school family life and sex education (FL/SE) programme is a presumed lack of parental and community endorsement of this instructional area. The study investigated the views of 1,100 parents concerning the amount of instructional emphasis that should be given to FL/SE at four school grades. Two major findings were (1) parental support ranged from 48% to 60% indicating that FL/SE should receive major teaching emphasis; (2) not more than 12% at any one grade indicated that FL/SE should receive no instructional emphasis. These findings appear to concur with those of similar surveys in the U.S. The author concludes that schools should determine the degree of parental support before moving ahead in this area, and proposes that they undertake research similar to the survey he carried out.

摘要

学校家庭生活与性教育(FL/SE)项目发展的一个主要障碍是,人们认为家长和社区对这一教学领域缺乏支持。该研究调查了1100名家长对于四个年级的学校应给予FL/SE教学重点程度的看法。两项主要研究结果为:(1)家长支持率在48%至60%之间,这表明FL/SE应得到主要教学重点;(2)在任何一个年级,不超过12%的家长表示FL/SE不应得到任何教学重点。这些研究结果似乎与美国类似调查的结果一致。作者得出结论,学校在推进这一领域工作之前应确定家长的支持程度,并建议他们开展与作者所进行的调查类似的研究。

相似文献

1
Parental opposition to sex education: pretext or reality?家长对性教育的反对:借口还是现实?
Int J Health Educ. 1982;24(3):195-9.
2
Sexuality education in fifth and sixth grades in U.S. public schools, 1999.1999年美国公立学校五、六年级的性教育
Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Sep-Oct;32(5):212-9.
3
Parent opinion of sexuality education in a state with mandated abstinence education: does policy match parental preference?在一个强制推行禁欲教育的州,家长对性教育的看法:政策与家长偏好相符吗?
J Adolesc Health. 2006 Nov;39(5):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.022. Epub 2006 Jul 10.
4
[Attitudes of Costa Rican students and teachers on sex and population education].[哥斯达黎加学生和教师对性与人口教育的态度]
Perspect Int Planif Fam. 1987(Spec No):1-6.
5
Instructional emphasis in family life and sex education: viewpoints of students, parents, teachers and principals at four grade levels.
J Sch Health. 1979 May;49(5):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1979.tb03848.x.
6
Support for comprehensive sexuality education: perspectives from parents of school-age youth.对全面性教育的支持:学龄青少年家长的观点
J Adolesc Health. 2008 Apr;42(4):352-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.019. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
7
Helping the community accept human sexuality content in a high school curriculum: the case of Pomona.
J Sch Health. 1976 Jan;46(1):49-50.
8
Sex education in Portugal.葡萄牙的性教育。
Plan Parent Eur. 1991 May;20(1):3-6.
9
A never-ending story: school family life / sex education in European countries.一个永无止境的故事:欧洲国家的学校家庭生活/性教育
Plan Parent Eur. 1991 May;20(1):2-3.
10
Sexuality education in the elementary school.小学阶段的性教育。
SIECUS Rep. 1985 Jan;13(3):1-4.