Suppr超能文献

胎儿旋转分娩:基兰德产钳与其他两种方法的比较。

Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.

作者信息

Healy D L, Quinn M A, Pepperell R J

出版信息

Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jul;89(7):501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x.

Abstract

A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 552 cases in which Kielland's forceps were used for rotation and delivery, 95 cases in which other forceps were used for rotation and delivery, and 160 cases in which manual rotation and forceps were used. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal morbidity between the three groups, regardless of whether the indication for delivery was delay in the second stage of labour or fetal distress. When Kielland's forceps were used by junior staff, significantly more vaginal and cervical lacerations and primary postpartum haemorrhage occurred, but there was no increase in fetal morbidity.

摘要

对552例使用基兰德产钳进行旋转和分娩的病例、95例使用其他产钳进行旋转和分娩的病例以及160例使用手法旋转和产钳的病例进行了回顾性比较。无论分娩指征是第二产程延长还是胎儿窘迫,三组之间的孕产妇或胎儿发病率均无显著差异。当初级工作人员使用基兰德产钳时,阴道和宫颈裂伤以及原发性产后出血的发生率显著更高,但胎儿发病率没有增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验