Healy D L, Quinn M A, Pepperell R J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Jul;89(7):501-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1982.tb03648.x.
A retrospective comparison was undertaken of 552 cases in which Kielland's forceps were used for rotation and delivery, 95 cases in which other forceps were used for rotation and delivery, and 160 cases in which manual rotation and forceps were used. There was no significant difference in maternal or fetal morbidity between the three groups, regardless of whether the indication for delivery was delay in the second stage of labour or fetal distress. When Kielland's forceps were used by junior staff, significantly more vaginal and cervical lacerations and primary postpartum haemorrhage occurred, but there was no increase in fetal morbidity.
对552例使用基兰德产钳进行旋转和分娩的病例、95例使用其他产钳进行旋转和分娩的病例以及160例使用手法旋转和产钳的病例进行了回顾性比较。无论分娩指征是第二产程延长还是胎儿窘迫,三组之间的孕产妇或胎儿发病率均无显著差异。当初级工作人员使用基兰德产钳时,阴道和宫颈裂伤以及原发性产后出血的发生率显著更高,但胎儿发病率没有增加。