Jackson S A, Cartwright A G, Lewis D
Calcif Tissue Res. 1978 Aug 18;25(3):217-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02010772.
Electron microscopical observations of the size and shape of bone mineral crystallites have not been in complete agreement with X-ray diffraction findings. The two prevalent viewpoints consider bone mineral crystals to be either rod, or plate like in habit. There appears to be agreement that the smallest dimension of the crystals is about 5 nm, but there is discrepancy in the reported c-axial lengths. The method of dark field imaging is used to obtain a quantitative measurement of the c-axial length distribution in rabbit, ox and human bone: mean c-axial lengths 32.6 nm, 36.2 nm and 32.4 nm, respectively, show no significant difference at the 5% level to the mean c-axial length measured by X-ray line broadening. Both bright and dark field images strongly suggest that bone mineral has a plate like form. Reasons for past discrepancies are discussed.
对骨矿物质微晶大小和形状的电子显微镜观察结果与X射线衍射结果并不完全一致。两种普遍的观点认为骨矿物质晶体的习性要么是棒状,要么是板状。似乎大家都认同晶体的最小尺寸约为5纳米,但所报道的c轴长度存在差异。采用暗场成像方法对兔、牛和人骨的c轴长度分布进行定量测量:平均c轴长度分别为32.6纳米、36.2纳米和32.4纳米,在5%的水平上与通过X射线线宽测量的平均c轴长度相比无显著差异。明场和暗场图像都有力地表明骨矿物质呈板状形态。文中讨论了过去存在差异的原因。