• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后喉返神经麻痹

Postoperative recurrent nerve palsy.

作者信息

Hockauf H, Sailer R

出版信息

Head Neck Surg. 1982 May-Jun;4(5):380-4. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890040506.

DOI:10.1002/hed.2890040506
PMID:7096098
Abstract

During the past seven years, a total of 1,713 patients underwent strumectomy for a variety of causes at the University of Düsseldorf. Unilateral palsies of the recurrent nerve developed in 147 patients. Both vocal cords were paralyzed in 22 patients. Of the 147 patients with unilateral palsies, 53 patients were available for follow-up examination after one year. In 28 of these patients, complete paresis of the vocal cord remained. Twenty-three patients showed complete recovery and normal function of the affected cord. In two patients, reduced but marked mobility of the previously completely paralyzed vocal cord was present. Of the 22 patients with bilateral recurrent nerve palsies, 10 were available for follow-up examination one year later. In three of these patients vocal cord movement was still absent, in three others one vocal cord showed normal function, and in only one patient did both vocal cords reveal normal physiologic mobility. Three other patients demonstrated a reduced but marked mobility of one vocal cord. The results are discussed in relation to the clinical and histologic data.

摘要

在过去七年中,杜塞尔多夫大学共有1713例患者因各种原因接受了甲状腺切除术。147例患者出现了喉返神经单侧麻痹。22例患者双侧声带麻痹。在147例单侧麻痹患者中,有53例患者在一年后可进行随访检查。在这些患者中,28例患者声带仍完全麻痹。23例患者受影响声带完全恢复且功能正常。2例患者先前完全麻痹的声带活动度降低但仍较明显。在22例双侧喉返神经麻痹患者中,10例患者在一年后可进行随访检查。其中3例患者声带仍无活动,另外3例患者一侧声带功能正常,仅1例患者双侧声带呈现正常生理活动度。另外3例患者一侧声带活动度降低但仍较明显。结合临床和组织学数据对结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Postoperative recurrent nerve palsy.术后喉返神经麻痹
Head Neck Surg. 1982 May-Jun;4(5):380-4. doi: 10.1002/hed.2890040506.
2
[Incidence of recurrent nerve palsy after strumectomy. Long term results (author's transl)].甲状腺切除术后喉返神经麻痹的发生率。长期结果(作者译)
Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg). 1980 Apr;59(4):250-4.
3
[Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid gland operations. Etiology and consequences].[甲状腺手术后喉返神经麻痹。病因及后果]
Chirurg. 1998 Sep;69(9):951-6. doi: 10.1007/s001040050520.
4
Should we routinely expose recurrent laryngeal nerve(s) during thyroid surgery?在甲状腺手术中,我们是否应该常规暴露喉返神经?
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Mar;23(3):186-9.
5
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy following heart-lung transplantation: three cases of vocal cord augmentation in the acute phase.心肺移植术后喉返神经麻痹:3例急性期声带增强病例
J Laryngol Otol. 1989 Oct;103(10):968-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100110643.
6
[Electromyography study and follow-up of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after thyroid gland operations].
HNO. 1997 Jul;45(7):551-5. doi: 10.1007/s001060050130.
7
A prospective evaluation of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis during thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术中喉返神经麻痹的前瞻性评估
Arch Surg. 2000 Feb;135(2):204-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.2.204.
8
[Therapeutic management of postoperatively diagnosed bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis].[术后诊断为双侧喉返神经麻痹的治疗管理]
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125(2):137-43.
9
Vocal cord paralysis following carotid endarterectomy: the paradox of return of function.
Ann Vasc Surg. 1990 Jan;4(1):42-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02042688.
10
Sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation test for predicting vocal cord palsy after thyroid surgery.术中喉返神经刺激试验预测甲状腺手术后声带麻痹的敏感性和特异性
World J Surg. 2006 Jul;30(7):1230-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0351-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Need for an individualized and aggressive management of multinodular goiters of endemic zones by specially trained surgeons: experience in western Nepal.需要由经过专门培训的外科医生对地方性甲状腺肿流行地区的多结节性甲状腺肿进行个体化和积极的管理:尼泊尔西部的经验
World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2101-9; discussion 2110-1. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0346-9.