Suppr超能文献

用于供体选择的血小板交叉配型检测。

Platelet crossmatch testing for donor selection.

作者信息

Slichter S J

出版信息

Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;88:153-64.

PMID:7100207
Abstract

Recent studies have shown that on an average the platelets of 20-30% of HLA fully compatible donors provide poor post-transfusion platelet responses in alloimmunized refractory thrombocytopenic patients. Conversely, some HLA incompatible transfusions can provide satisfactory platelet increments for the refractory recipient. To improve the process of selecting compatible platelet donors, both lymphocytotoxic and platelet crossmatch tests have been used. Lymphocytotoxicity crossmatch tests can predict the transfusion response only 65% of the time with a high percentage of false-negative results. In contrast, several different laboratories are now reporting 84-93% predictability for platelet crossmatch tests. Because of the time and effort involved in obtaining platelets from apheresis donors and the risk of bleeding in patients not provided with compatible platelets, it seems inevitable that platelet crossmatch tests will assume an increasingly important role in the donor selection process.

摘要

最近的研究表明,平均而言,20%-30% HLA完全相合供者的血小板在同种免疫性难治性血小板减少症患者中输血后血小板反应不佳。相反,一些HLA不相合的输血可为难治性受者提供令人满意的血小板增量。为了改进选择相合血小板供者的过程,淋巴细胞毒性试验和血小板交叉配血试验都已被采用。淋巴细胞毒性交叉配血试验仅能在65%的时间内预测输血反应,且假阴性结果的比例很高。相比之下,现在有几个不同的实验室报告血小板交叉配血试验的预测准确率为84%-93%。由于从单采供者获取血小板需要时间和精力,以及未得到相合血小板的患者有出血风险,血小板交叉配血试验在供者选择过程中似乎将不可避免地发挥越来越重要的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验