Suppr超能文献

颈动脉疾病的诊断——定向多普勒、双功扫描仪与血管造影术的比较

Diagnosis of carotid artery disease--comparison between directional Doppler, Duplex scanner and angiography.

作者信息

Zbornikova V, Akesson J A, Lassvik C

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 1982 Apr;65(4):335-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1982.tb03090.x.

Abstract

Examinations with directional Doppler (DD) with 10 MHz transducer, and pulsed Doppler in combination with two-dimensional sector scanner with 3 MHz transducer (Duplex) were carried out on 100 vessels in 51 patients with transitory ischemic attacks (TIA) and minor stroke within the territory of the internal carotid artery before angiography. The question at issue was to evaluate the accuracy of both methods in discriminating between occlusion and stenosis. A correct diagnosis was made by DD in 92 vessels out of 100 and by Duplex in 98 out of 100. All nine occlusions were correctly diagnosed by Duplex, but only five of them by DD, while the four remaining vessels were considered as stenosis greater than 50%. Out of 15 stenoses greater than 50%, 14 were correctly detected by Duplex and 11 by DD. One patient with tortuous vessel without stenosis was classified as greater than 50% stenosis by Duplex, and one vessel with 1 mm lumen was called occlusion by Duplex and DD. In conclusion, the Duplex scanner offers increased possibility to differ between high-grade stenosis and occlusion of the carotid arteries as compared with earlier non-invasive techniques.

摘要

在血管造影前,对51例颈内动脉供血区域发生短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和轻度中风的患者的100条血管进行了检查,采用10MHz探头的定向多普勒(DD)以及结合3MHz探头二维扇形扫描仪的脉冲多普勒(双功超声)检查。争论的问题是评估这两种方法在区分闭塞和狭窄方面的准确性。DD在100条血管中对92条做出了正确诊断,双功超声在100条血管中对98条做出了正确诊断。双功超声正确诊断出了所有9条闭塞血管,但DD仅正确诊断出其中5条,其余4条血管被认为狭窄程度大于50%。在15条狭窄程度大于50%的血管中,双功超声正确检测出14条,DD正确检测出11条。1例血管迂曲但无狭窄的患者被双功超声判定为狭窄程度大于50%,1条管腔直径为1mm的血管被双功超声和DD判定为闭塞。总之,与早期的非侵入性技术相比,双功超声扫描仪在区分颈动脉高度狭窄和闭塞方面具有更大的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验