Montgomery G T, Silva-Herrera D, Cain R E
Am J Phys Med. 1982 Aug;61(4):193-7.
In an extension of a previous experiment by Zappala (1970), prior training in anatomy and physiology was investigated as a determinant of frontal EMG biofeedback performance. Fourteen subjects with no college coursework in anatomy and physiology and little demonstrated knowledge of anatomy and physiology were compared with fifteen college students with coursework and demonstrated knowledge of anatomy and physiology. Each subject completed 11 sessions. Sessions one through three were baseline sessions, while sessions 4-11 included an initial (5-minute) baseline, followed by three (4-minute) biofeedback periods. The results indicated no differences in EMG performance among the two subject groups. Significant reductions in EMG were obtained over feedback sessions, and the four male subjects obtained lower levels of EMG than the 25 female subjects.
在扎帕拉(1970年)之前一项实验的扩展研究中,对解剖学和生理学的预先训练作为额肌肌电图生物反馈表现的一个决定因素进行了调查。将14名没有解剖学和生理学大学课程且几乎没有展示出解剖学和生理学知识的受试者与15名有解剖学和生理学课程且展示出相关知识的大学生进行了比较。每个受试者完成11次训练。第一至三次训练是基线训练,而第4 - 11次训练包括一个初始(5分钟)基线,随后是三个(4分钟)生物反馈阶段。结果表明两个受试者组之间在肌电图表现上没有差异。在反馈训练期间肌电图显著降低,并且4名男性受试者的肌电图水平低于25名女性受试者。