Suppr超能文献

迟发性运动障碍录像评分技术的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of a tardive dyskinesia videotape rating technique.

作者信息

Barnes T R, Trauer T

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1982 May;140:508-15. doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.5.508.

Abstract

Ninety-four psychiatric in-patients, receiving regular antipsychotic medication, were videotaped using a standard procedure. The tapes were rated by blind observers using a simple scoring system for the duration of abnormal movements. Using this combined videotape and rating scale assessment technique the re-rating reliability, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability were high. In order to demonstrate the validity of the technique the rating scale scores in a sub-sample of 30 patients, were compared with the assessment of three experienced clinicians on the same patients, and AIMs scores. Central (lip, tongue, jaw and neck movements) scores showed close agreement with the clinicians' assessment, suggesting that clinical diagnosis is based principally on the presence and severity of oro-facial dyskinesia. Total rating scale scores were in close accord with total AIMs scores. When the two scales were carried out on the same patients on the same occasion a diagnostic criterion level of 2 or more on the central score produced a tardive dyskinesia prevalence rate identical to that produced by an AIMS criterion level of 2 or more on the global severity rating. The tardive dyskinesia prevalence rate based on the central score criterion level showed an increase with age.

摘要

94名接受常规抗精神病药物治疗的精神科住院患者,按照标准程序进行了录像。录像由不知情的观察者使用一种简单的评分系统对异常动作的持续时间进行评分。使用这种录像和评分量表相结合的评估技术,重新评分信度、评分者间信度和重测信度都很高。为了证明该技术的有效性,对30名患者的子样本的评分量表分数与三位经验丰富的临床医生对同一患者的评估以及异常不自主运动量表(AIMs)分数进行了比较。中枢(嘴唇、舌头、下巴和颈部运动)评分与临床医生的评估结果高度一致,这表明临床诊断主要基于口面部运动障碍的存在和严重程度。总评分量表分数与总AIMs分数高度一致。当在同一时间对同一患者进行两种量表评估时,中枢评分2分或更高的诊断标准水平所产生的迟发性运动障碍患病率与全球严重程度评分中AIMs标准水平2分或更高所产生的患病率相同。基于中枢评分标准水平的迟发性运动障碍患病率随年龄增长而增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验