• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The context of involuntary commitment on the basis of danger to others: a study of the use of the California 14-day certificate.

作者信息

Yesavage J A, Werner P D, Becker J M, Mills M J

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982 Oct;170(10):622-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198210000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-198210000-00006
PMID:7108497
Abstract

This study examines the applications of civil commitment criteria for prolonged (14-day) involuntary hospitalization of individuals judged to be dangerous to others by reason of mental illness. The California Civil Commitment Statute (Lanterman-Petris-Short, LPS) provides for such commitment, after a 72-hour period of observations. For a sample of 71 males on an acute inpatient unit, we examined the relationship between 14-day certification by reason of dangerousness to others (DO) under the LPS and measures of prehospitalization dangerousness, prior legal status, assaultive behavior in hospital, and mental status. The 31 per cent of subjects who were certified as DO were found to have been significantly more often held initially for 72-hour observation on the DO grounds than were patients who were certified for other reasons. However, subjects in the DO group were no different from the contrast groups on ratings of assaultiveness of preadmission behavior and of violent acts while in hospital. The implications of these results for the evaluation of civil commitment proceedings are discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
The context of involuntary commitment on the basis of danger to others: a study of the use of the California 14-day certificate.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1982 Oct;170(10):622-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198210000-00006.
2
Short-term civil commitment and the violent patient.短期民事收容与暴力患者
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;139(9):1145-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1145.
3
A study of mandatory review of civil commitment.一项关于民事强制收容的强制审查研究。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Mar;41(3):305-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790140095012.
4
Legislating social control of the mentally ill in California.加利福尼亚州对精神病患者进行社会管控的立法
Am J Psychiatry. 1981 Mar;138(3):334-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.138.3.334.
5
Violence, civil commitment, and hospitalization.暴力、民事强制收容与住院治疗。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Feb;174(2):107-11. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198602000-00006.
6
Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. I. The assessment of dangerousness by emergency room clinicians.精神科急诊室中的民事住院治疗。一、急诊室临床医生对危险性的评估。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):748-52. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320064008.
7
Civil commitment in the psychiatric emergency room. II. Mental disorder indicators and three dangerousness criteria.精神科急诊室中的民事住院治疗。二、精神障碍指标和三项危险性标准。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):753-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320069009.
8
Civil commitment practices in 1977: troubled semantics and/or troubled psychiatry.
Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1979 Jun;24(4):329-35. doi: 10.1177/070674377902400409.
9
Conservatorship for the "gravely disabled": California's nondeclaration of nonindependence.对“严重残疾者”的监护:加利福尼亚州未宣布的不独立状态
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1978;1(4):395-426.
10
Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1980;3(4):405-19. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(80)90025-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and social factors associated with increased risk for involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis.与非自愿精神科住院风险增加相关的临床和社会因素:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;6(12):1039-1053. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30406-7.