Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物与非阿片类药物引起的足部电击镇痛(FSIA):电击的身体部位是一个关键因素。

Opiate vs non-opiate footshock-induced analgesia (FSIA): the body region shocked is a critical factor.

作者信息

Watkins L R, Cobelli D A, Faris P, Aceto M D, Mayer D J

出版信息

Brain Res. 1982 Jun 24;242(2):299-308. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90313-4.

Abstract

Previous work has demonstrated that footshock can elicit either opiate or non-opiate analgesia. The present study has demonstrated that one critical factor determining the involvement of endogenous opioids is the body region shocked. Using 90 s shock, front paw shock produced an opiate analgesia which was significantly antagonized by as little as 0.1 mg/kg systemic naloxone and morphine tolerance. In the latter experiment, a parallel recovery of the analgesic potencies of both front paw shock and morphine was observed following 2 weeks of opiate abstinence. In contrast, hind paw shock produced a non-opiate analgesia which failed to be attenuated by 20 mg/kg systemic naloxone and showed no cross-tolerance to morphine. Since identical shock parameters were used for front paw and hind paw shock in the systemic naloxone experiments, stress per se clearly cannot be the crucial factor determining the involvement of endogenous opioids in footshock-induced analgesia. These results were discussed with respect to clinical treatments of pain which utilize somatosensory stimulation.

摘要

先前的研究表明,足部电击可引发阿片类或非阿片类镇痛。本研究表明,决定内源性阿片类物质参与的一个关键因素是电击的身体部位。使用90秒的电击,前爪电击产生阿片类镇痛,低至0.1mg/kg的全身纳洛酮和吗啡耐受性就能显著拮抗这种镇痛。在后一个实验中,在阿片类物质戒断2周后,观察到前爪电击和吗啡的镇痛效力平行恢复。相比之下,后爪电击产生非阿片类镇痛,20mg/kg的全身纳洛酮未能减弱这种镇痛,且对吗啡无交叉耐受性。由于在全身纳洛酮实验中,前爪和后爪电击使用了相同的电击参数,因此应激本身显然不是决定内源性阿片类物质参与足部电击诱导镇痛的关键因素。就利用体感刺激的疼痛临床治疗对这些结果进行了讨论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验