Norton J C
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Oct;34(4):916-22. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197810)34:4<916::aid-jclp2270340418>3.0.co;2-4.
The Trail Making Test and Bender Background Interference Procedure were evaluated with 598 Ss against both external neurologic criteria and against psychological opinion derived from a more complete evaluation. For Trails, highly significant differences in mean scores were seen when preselected neurologic patients and patients without neurologic stigmata were compared. Similarly, the distribution of classification of these patients by Bender is significantly different from chance. Application of these measures in a screening paradigm, however, yielded large numbers of false negatives against both neurological and psychological criteria. It was not possible to establish an optimal cutting score to justify application of these measures as screening devices, either alone or in concert.
对598名受试者进行了连线测验和本德尔背景干扰程序评估，评估依据是外部神经学标准以及来自更全面评估得出的心理学观点。对于连线测验，当比较预先选定的神经疾病患者和无神经疾病体征的患者时，平均得分存在高度显著差异。同样，这些患者通过本德尔测验的分类分布与随机情况有显著差异。然而，在筛查模式中应用这些测量方法时，无论根据神经学标准还是心理学标准，都产生了大量假阴性结果。单独或联合使用这些测量方法作为筛查工具时，无法确定一个最佳的分界分数来证明其适用性。
