Sanson-Fisher B
J Clin Psychol. 1978 Oct;34(4):971-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197810)34:4<971::aid-jclp2270340431>3.0.co;2-w.
Randomly arranged 10 high stimuli into 45 pairs, and a group of psychologists made judgments as to the similarity of the pairs in terms of Truax and Carkhuff's (1967) definition of empathy along a 7-point scale. A similar procedure was followed for the 10 stimuli in the "low" group and the results analyzed by multidimensional scaling. Three similar dimensions accounted for a majority of the variance in Ss judgments in both groups. Dimension One was interpreted in terms of the appropriateness vs. inappropriateness of the therapist's voice tone and comments. Dimension Two reflected high vs. low emotional intensity. Dimension Three was interpreted as patient vs. therapist dominance. An attempt was made to relate these dimensions to those proposed by Truax and Carkhuff (1967) to be involved in the empathetic process.
将10个高强度刺激随机组合成45对,一组心理学家根据特鲁克斯和卡科夫(1967年)对共情的定义,在7分制量表上对这些配对的相似性进行判断。对“低强度”组的10个刺激也采用了类似的程序,并通过多维标度分析结果。三个相似的维度占了两组被试判断中大部分的方差。维度一根据治疗师的语调与评论的恰当性与否来解释。维度二反映了高情感强度与低情感强度。维度三被解释为患者与治疗师的主导性。研究试图将这些维度与特鲁克斯和卡科夫(1967年)提出的、参与共情过程的维度联系起来。