• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Relationship between grade and stage of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and regional pelvic lymph node metastases.

作者信息

Zincke H, Farrow G M, Myers R P, Benson R C, Furlow W L, Utz D C

出版信息

J Urol. 1982 Sep;128(3):498-501. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53013-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53013-x
PMID:7120555
Abstract

The relationship of grade and local tumor extent to pelvic nodal involvement was assessed surgically in 469 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Grade and local stage alone and combined score were associated in a linear fashion with nodal involvement. Gleason sum and Mayo grade alone were not predictive of nodal metastases. Some patients with a Gleason score of 4 had positive nodes and some with a score of 8 to 10 had negative nodes. Mayo sum (grade plus stage) consistently was related to negative nodal involvement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Relationship between grade and stage of adenocarcinoma of the prostate and regional pelvic lymph node metastases.
J Urol. 1982 Sep;128(3):498-501. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53013-x.
2
Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:淋巴结转移发生率高。
J Urol. 2002 Apr;167(4):1681-6.
3
Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.预测当代前列腺癌中的盆腔淋巴结累及情况。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):906-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.053. Epub 2011 Feb 6.
4
The incidence of lymph node metastases in prostate carcinoma depends not only on tumor characteristics but also on surgical performance and extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy.前列腺癌中淋巴结转移的发生率不仅取决于肿瘤特征,还取决于手术表现和盆腔淋巴结清扫的范围。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2008;44(8):601-8.
5
Incidence, location, and significance of periprostatic and periseminal vesicle lymph nodes in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中前列腺周围和精囊周围淋巴结的发生率、位置及意义。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 Nov;25(11):1429-32. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200111000-00012.
6
Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer: A prospective observational study.临床局限性前列腺癌患者的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Actas Urol Esp. 2016 Sep;40(7):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
7
Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.机器人辅助扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗中高危前列腺癌。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):1004-10. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.048. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
8
Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌患者中盆腔淋巴结阳性的发生率、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平≤10 ng/mL且活检Gleason评分≤6的情况及其对根治性前列腺切除术后无PSA进展生存期的影响。
BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06166.x.
9
Percutaneous lymph node aspiration biopsy and tumor grade in staging of prostatic carcinoma.经皮淋巴结穿刺活检与前列腺癌分期中的肿瘤分级
Prostate. 1984;5(4):459-68. doi: 10.1002/pros.2990050411.
10
Lymph node count threshold for optimal pelvic lymph node staging in prostate cancer.前列腺癌中用于最佳盆腔淋巴结分期的淋巴结计数阈值。
Int J Urol. 2012 Jul;19(7):645-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02993.x. Epub 2012 Mar 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.T1c期前列腺癌:确定合适的分期评估及盆腔淋巴结清扫术的作用。
World J Urol. 1997;15(6):346-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01300182.
2
The metastatic potential of prostate carcinomas composed entirely of single malignant glands.完全由单个恶性腺管构成的前列腺癌的转移潜能。
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1987;411(5):399-402. doi: 10.1007/BF00735219.