• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对穿透性和钝性创伤手术中诊断性腹腔灌洗标准的重新评估。

Reappraisal of diagnostic peritoneal lavage criteria for operation in penetrating and blunt trauma.

作者信息

Alyono D, Morrow C E, Perry J F

出版信息

Surgery. 1982 Oct;92(4):751-7.

PMID:7123495
Abstract

The criteria for declaring the results of a diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) positive have been controversial. Lowered cell count criteria result in increased sensitivity, decreased specificity, and altered accuracy. Consecutive lavages on 105 patients with penetrating trauma (PT) to the lower chest and abdomen (48 gunshot wounds and 57 stab wounds) and 1812 patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BT) were studied. Varied cell count criteria were analyzed. The best criteria for BT were as follows: positive, lavage fluid red blood cells (LRBCs) greater than 100,000/mm3 or lavage fluid white blood cells (LWBCs) greater than 500/mm3; indeterminate, LRBCs 50,000/mm3 to 100,000/mm3 or LWBCs 100 to 500/mm3; and negative, LRBCs less than 50,000/mm3 and LWBCs less than 100/mm3. Based on these criteria the accuracy of the test was 99.1%. The highest accuracy would be achieved for PT if the criteria were as follows: positive, LRBCs greater than 50,000/mm3 or LWBCs greater than 500/mm3; indeterminate, LRBCs 25,000 to 50,000/mm3 or LWBCs 100 to 500/mm3; negative, LRBCs less than 25,000/mm3 and LWBCs less than 100/mm3. Based on these criteria the accuracy of the test for PT would range from 96.2% (101 of 105) to 98.1% (103 of 105), depending on the results of repeat lavage for two patients with indeterminate initial lavages. The standard lavage criteria were the best for BT and achieved the highest accuracy. However, the LRBC criteria should be lowered for PT.

摘要

诊断性腹腔灌洗(DPL)结果呈阳性的判定标准一直存在争议。降低细胞计数标准会导致敏感性增加、特异性降低以及准确性改变。对105例下胸部和腹部穿透伤(PT)患者(48例枪伤和57例刺伤)以及1812例钝性腹部创伤(BT)患者进行了连续灌洗研究。分析了不同的细胞计数标准。BT的最佳标准如下:阳性,灌洗液红细胞(LRBC)大于100,000/mm³ 或灌洗液白细胞(LWBC)大于500/mm³;不确定,LRBC为50,000/mm³ 至100,000/mm³ 或LWBC为100至500/mm³;阴性,LRBC小于50,000/mm³ 且LWBC小于100/mm³。基于这些标准,该检查的准确性为99.1%。对于PT,如果标准如下,将达到最高准确性:阳性,LRBC大于50,000/mm³ 或LWBC大于500/mm³;不确定,LRBC为25,000至50,000/mm³ 或LWBC为100至500/mm³;阴性,LRBC小于25,000/mm³ 且LWBC小于100/mm³。基于这些标准,PT检查的准确性将在96.2%(105例中的101例)至98.1%(105例中的103例)之间,具体取决于两名初始灌洗结果不确定患者的重复灌洗结果。标准灌洗标准对BT是最佳的,并实现了最高准确性。然而,对于PT,LRBC标准应降低。

相似文献

1
Reappraisal of diagnostic peritoneal lavage criteria for operation in penetrating and blunt trauma.对穿透性和钝性创伤手术中诊断性腹腔灌洗标准的重新评估。
Surgery. 1982 Oct;92(4):751-7.
2
Clinical uses of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in stab wounds of the anterior abdomen: a prospective study.诊断性腹腔灌洗在前腹壁刺伤中的临床应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg. 2002;168(8-9):490-3. doi: 10.1080/110241502321116514.
3
The diagnostic usefulness of peritoneal lavage in penetrating trauma: a prospective evaluation and comparison with blunt trauma.腹腔灌洗在穿透性创伤中的诊断价值:一项前瞻性评估及与钝性创伤的比较。
Am Surg. 1982 Aug;48(8):402-7.
4
Is diagnostic peritoneal lavage for blunt trauma obsolete?诊断性腹腔灌洗用于钝性创伤是否过时了?
Am Surg. 1990 Feb;56(2):96-9.
5
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: is 100,000 RBCs a valid figure for penetrating abdominal trauma?诊断性腹腔灌洗:100,000个红细胞对于穿透性腹部创伤来说是一个有效的数值吗?
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):853-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31803245d9.
6
Peritoneal lavage enzyme determinations following blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma.钝性和穿透性腹部创伤后的腹腔灌洗酶测定
J Trauma. 1991 Aug;31(8):1161-4.
7
Diagnostic peritoneal lavage: is an isolated WBC count greater than or equal to 500/mm3 predictive of intra-abdominal injury requiring celiotomy in blunt trauma patients?诊断性腹腔灌洗:在钝性创伤患者中,单独的白细胞计数大于或等于500/mm³ 是否可预测需要剖腹手术的腹腔内损伤?
J Trauma. 1990 Jul;30(7):874-9.
8
Peritoneal lavage and the surgical resident.腹腔灌洗与外科住院医师。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Dec;165(6):496-502.
9
Peritoneal lavage in the evaluation of penetrating abdominal trauma.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Dec;153(6):861-3.
10
Morbidity of a negative finding at laparotomy in abdominal trauma.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979 Jan;148(1):23-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical judgment in the management of abdominal stab wounds. Utilizing clinical criteria from a 10-year experience.腹部刺伤处理中的外科判断。基于十年经验的临床标准运用。
Ann Surg. 1984 May;199(5):549-54. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198405000-00009.