Virmani R, Chun P K, Parker J, McAllister H A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Nov;84(5):773-8.
Three patients, two undergoing mitral valve replacement and one a mitral valve annuloplasty with a Carpentier-Edwards ring, had suture obliteration of the circumflex coronary artery. Examination of the distance of the circumflex artery from the mitral anulus in 15 specimens showed a direct correlation to the type of coronary dominance. That is, left dominance (4.1 mm, range 3 to 6.5) or codominance (5.5 mm, range 4.5 to 7.5), where the posterior descending artery arises from the circumflex, was associated with greater proximity to the mitral anulus than right dominance (8.4 mm, range 6 to 11.5). Two of our patients had left dominance and one codominance, predisposing them to circumflex injury. Factors that identify patients at high risk for such injury are therefore left dominance and codominance. Surgeons forewarned with this information can now focus on the proximal third of the circumflex--the area most predisposed to injury.
三名患者中,两名接受二尖瓣置换术,一名采用Carpentier-Edwards环进行二尖瓣环成形术,均出现了旋支冠状动脉缝线闭塞。对15个标本中旋支动脉与二尖瓣环的距离进行检查,结果显示与冠状动脉优势类型存在直接关联。也就是说,左优势型(4.1毫米,范围3至6.5毫米)或共优势型(5.5毫米,范围4.5至7.5毫米,即后降支动脉起源于旋支)时,旋支动脉与二尖瓣环的距离比右优势型(8.4毫米,范围6至11.5毫米)更近。我们的两名患者为左优势型,一名为共优势型,这使他们易于发生旋支损伤。因此,识别此类损伤高危患者的因素为左优势型和共优势型。提前知晓此信息的外科医生现在可以将注意力集中在旋支的近端三分之一处,即最易发生损伤的区域。