• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

流感氧化铝吸附疫苗与水性疫苗的抗原性及耐受性比较。

Comparison of the antigenicity and tolerance of an influenza aluminium oxide adsorbate vaccine with an aqueous vaccine.

作者信息

Pressler K, Peukert M, Schenk D, Borgoño M

出版信息

Pharmatherapeutica. 1982;3(3):195-200.

PMID:7134227
Abstract

A randomized trial was carried out in 189 adult subjects to test the antigenicity and tolerance of two experimental influenza vaccines, one adsorbed onto aluminium oxide and the other one aqueous, with equal antigen contents. Blood samples for antibody assays, using the haemagglutination inhibition test and the neuraminidase inhibition test, were taken before and 30, 90 and 180 days after vaccination. The results showed that the adsorbate influenza vaccine had a superior immunogenic action to the aqueous vaccine at the same dose rate. There were no significant differences between the tolerances of the two vaccines, which were injected with a needle. About 81% of the vaccinated subjects showed no subjective or objective signs of intolerance. Systemic reactions, which were reported by 9% of the vaccinated subjects, were verified by the doctor in only 2% of cases.

摘要

对189名成年受试者进行了一项随机试验,以测试两种实验性流感疫苗的抗原性和耐受性,一种吸附于氧化铝上,另一种为水性疫苗,两种疫苗抗原含量相同。在接种疫苗前以及接种后30天、90天和180天采集血样,采用血凝抑制试验和神经氨酸酶抑制试验进行抗体检测。结果表明,在相同剂量率下,吸附型流感疫苗的免疫原性优于水性疫苗。两种通过注射接种的疫苗在耐受性方面没有显著差异。约81%的接种受试者未出现不耐受的主观或客观迹象。9%的接种受试者报告了全身反应,但医生仅在2%的病例中证实了这些反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the antigenicity and tolerance of an influenza aluminium oxide adsorbate vaccine with an aqueous vaccine.流感氧化铝吸附疫苗与水性疫苗的抗原性及耐受性比较。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1982;3(3):195-200.
2
Antibody formation after vaccination with adsorbed and non-adsorbed A/New Jersey/8/76 influenza vaccines.
Pharmatherapeutica. 1982;3(3):201-8.
3
[Field trial with a new type of influenza subunit vaccine (author's transl)].新型流感亚单位疫苗的现场试验(作者译)
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1976 Aug 13;88(15):504-8.
4
Immunogenicity, safety, and cross-reactivity of an inactivated, adjuvanted, prototype pandemic influenza (H5N1) vaccine: a phase II, double-blind, randomized trial.一种灭活的、含佐剂的大流行性流感(H5N1)原型疫苗的免疫原性、安全性及交叉反应性:一项II期双盲随机试验
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Apr 15;48(8):1087-95. doi: 10.1086/597401.
5
[Comparative study on safety and immunogenicity between influenza subunit vaccine and split vaccine].流感亚单位疫苗与裂解疫苗安全性和免疫原性的比较研究
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;24(7):570-3.
6
Immunogenicity of a monovalent, aluminum-adjuvanted influenza whole virus vaccine for pandemic use.一种用于大流行的单价铝佐剂流感全病毒疫苗的免疫原性。
Virus Res. 2004 Jul;103(1-2):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.029.
7
An adjuvanted, low-dose, pandemic influenza A (H5N1) vaccine candidate is safe, immunogenic, and induces cross-reactive immune responses in healthy adults.一种佐剂、低剂量的大流行性甲型流感(H5N1)候选疫苗在健康成年人中是安全的、具有免疫原性的,并能诱导交叉反应性免疫应答。
J Infect Dis. 2008 Sep 1;198(5):642-9. doi: 10.1086/590913.
8
Immunogenicity and safety of low dose virosomal adjuvanted influenza vaccine administered intradermally compared to intramuscular full dose administration.与肌内注射全剂量相比,皮内注射低剂量病毒体佐剂流感疫苗的免疫原性和安全性。
Vaccine. 2009 Jun 2;27(27):3561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.062. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of a prototype adjuvanted inactivated split-virus influenza A (H5N1) vaccine in infants and children.一种原型佐剂灭活裂解甲型流感(H5N1)疫苗在婴幼儿中的安全性和免疫原性。
Vaccine. 2008 Nov 25;26(50):6383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.046. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
10
Long-lasting immunogenicity of a virosomal vaccine in older children and young adults with type I diabetes mellitus.一种病毒体疫苗在患有I型糖尿病的大龄儿童和青年成年人中的持久免疫原性。
Vaccine. 2009 Aug 27;27(39):5357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.082. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Aluminium adjuvants versus placebo or no intervention in vaccine randomised clinical trials: a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.铝佐剂与安慰剂或疫苗随机临床试验中不干预的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 23;12(6):e058795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058795.
2
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine given with or without aluminum hydroxide to healthy adults: results of a phase I-II randomized clinical trial.健康成年人接种含或不含氢氧化铝的甲型H5N1流感灭活疫苗的安全性和免疫原性:一项I-II期随机临床试验的结果
J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 1;198(9):1309-16. doi: 10.1086/592172.