Zuccotti Gian Vincenzo, Scaramuzza Andrea, Riboni Sara, Mameli Chiara, Pariani Elena, Tanzi Elisabetta, Zanetti Alessandro, Radaelli Giovanni
Department of Pediatrics, University of Milan, Luigi Sacco Hospital, 20157 Milan, Italy.
Vaccine. 2009 Aug 27;27(39):5357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.082. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
To evaluate the long-lasting immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a virosomal influenza vaccine in subjects with type I diabetes, a trial was conducted during the 2007-2008 influenza season in Milan, Northern Italy. One hundred five subjects aged 9-30 years were randomized to receive by intramuscular injection vaccination by a single dose (0.5 ml) of either a virosomal (Inflexal V) (n=52) or a standard subunit (Influvac) (n=53) vaccine. Serum hemagglutinin inhibition antibody titres were determined against the three recommended influenza-like strains, A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B, at pre-vaccination, and 1 and 6 months post-vaccination. Geometric mean titres were increased in the two groups 1 and 6 months post-vaccination (P<0.001). One month post-vaccination both vaccines met the CPMP requirement for immunogenicity with high seroprotection rates (>95%) for strains A/H1N1 and A/H3N2, and a seroprotection of 73% and 70% in the virosomal and subunit vaccine for strain B. Mean fold increase ranged 2.8 (A/H3N2)-6.2 (A/H1N1) in the virosomal group and 2.3 (A/H3N2)-4.8 (A/H1N1) in the subunit group. Immunogenicity declined 6 months post-vaccination in both groups, and the CPMP requirement for immunogenicity was satisfied only in the virosomal group. In subjects without pre-existing antibodies to strain B (titre <10), the virosomal vaccine showed higher immune response than the subunit vaccine 6 months post-vaccination, with a geometric mean titre (95% CI) of 40.2 (30.7-54.6) vs. 21.2 (14.6-30.8). Reactogenicity was similar in the two vaccines. All reactions were transient and not severe. The results indicate that in older children and young adults with type I diabetes influenza vaccination with a virosomal or a standard subunit vaccine is safe and adequately immunogenic against the three influenza vaccine strains. In addition, the virosomal vaccine may show better long-lasting immune response than the standard subunit vaccine, especially in subjects without pre-existing antibodies to influenza strains.
为评估一种病毒体流感疫苗在I型糖尿病患者中的长期免疫原性和反应原性,于2007 - 2008年流感季节在意大利北部米兰进行了一项试验。105名年龄在9至30岁的受试者被随机分组,通过肌肉注射单剂量(0.5毫升)的病毒体疫苗(Inflexal V)(n = 52)或标准亚单位疫苗(Influvac)(n = 53)进行接种。在接种前、接种后1个月和6个月测定针对三种推荐的流感样毒株A/H1N1、A/H3N2和B的血清血凝素抑制抗体滴度。接种后1个月和6个月,两组的几何平均滴度均有所升高(P < 0.001)。接种后1个月,两种疫苗均符合欧洲药品评价局(CPMP)对免疫原性的要求,A/H1N1和A/H3N2毒株的血清保护率高(> 95%),病毒体疫苗和亚单位疫苗对B毒株的血清保护率分别为73%和70%。病毒体组的平均升高倍数范围为2.8(A/H3N2) - 6.2(A/H1N1),亚单位组为2.3(A/H3N2) - 4.8(A/H1N1)。接种后6个月,两组的免疫原性均下降,且仅病毒体组满足CPMP对免疫原性的要求。在对B毒株无预先存在抗体(滴度< 10)的受试者中,接种后6个月病毒体疫苗的免疫反应高于亚单位疫苗,几何平均滴度(95%可信区间)为40.2(30.7 - 54.6),而亚单位疫苗为21.2(14.6 - 30.8)。两种疫苗的反应原性相似。所有反应均为短暂性且不严重。结果表明,对于I型糖尿病的大龄儿童和青年成人,接种病毒体疫苗或标准亚单位疫苗进行流感疫苗接种是安全的,并且对三种流感疫苗毒株具有足够的免疫原性。此外,病毒体疫苗可能比标准亚单位疫苗表现出更好的长期免疫反应,尤其是在对流感毒株无预先存在抗体的受试者中。