Suppr超能文献

[1970年克拉斯尼科夫分类中白色类放线菌的系统位置]

[Systematic place of the act nomycetes of the Albidus Krassilnikov, 1970 group].

作者信息

Kuznetsov V D, Sabirov S, Filippova S N, Poltorak V A

出版信息

Mikrobiologiia. 1978 Sep-Oct;47(5):831-40.

PMID:713876
Abstract

Detailed studies of the taxonomical characteristics and the complex of produced antibiotics made it possible to establish the identity of Actinomyces albus var. fungatus, Solovieva et Rudaya, 1959 and Actinomyces tumemacerans, Krassilnikov et Koveshnikov, 1962. Both organisms produce a complex of antibiotics comprising albofungin, albonursin, and a polyene antibiotic belonging to the group of tetraenes. The cultures do not belong to the group of verticillate actinomycetes as was believed earlier (Krassilnikov, 1970). The later name, Actinomyces tumemacerans, is more appropriate since the organism described under the name of Act. albus var. fungatus differs sharply from other representatives of Act. albus and therefore cannot be regarded as its variety (nomen confusum). Actinomyces sp. RIA-248 producing albofungin differs from Act. tumemacerans P-42 as well as from Act. albus var. fungatus RIA-247 by the complex of produced antibiotics and other taxonomic properties. Apparently, it should be classed as a new species.

摘要

对分类学特征以及所产生抗生素复合物的详细研究,使得确定1959年索洛维耶娃和鲁达亚描述的白色放线菌真菌变种(Actinomyces albus var. fungatus)与1962年克拉西里尼科夫和科韦什尼科夫描述的肿胀放线菌(Actinomyces tumemacerans)的同一性成为可能。这两种微生物都产生一种抗生素复合物,其中包括白真菌素、白诺菌素以及一种属于四烯类的多烯抗生素。这些培养物并不属于如先前(克拉西里尼科夫,1970年)所认为的轮生放线菌组。后来的名称“肿胀放线菌”更为合适,因为以白色放线菌真菌变种之名描述的微生物与白色放线菌的其他代表菌株有显著差异,因此不能被视为其变种(名称混淆)。产生白真菌素的放线菌RIA - 248在产生的抗生素复合物以及其他分类学特性方面,与肿胀放线菌P - 42以及白色放线菌真菌变种RIA - 247都不同。显然,它应被归类为一个新物种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验