The cautious advance on the right to treatment.
作者信息
Appelbaum P S
出版信息
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;33(11):895-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.11.895.
PMID:7141423
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The cautious advance on the right to treatment.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;33(11):895-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.11.895.
2
The Supreme Court and institutions: a comment on Youngberg v. Romeo.
Ment Retard. 1982 Oct;20(5):197-200.
3
Legal issues in mental health administration.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1983;6(1):39-55. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(83)90005-5.
4
Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Sci News. 1982 Jun 26;121(26):420.
5
Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep. 1982 Jan-Feb;6(1):12-3.
6
Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
J Psychiatry Law. 1982 Summer;10(2):205-22. doi: 10.1177/009318538201000206.
7
Refusing treatment: the uncertainty continues.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1983 Jan;34(1):11-2. doi: 10.1176/ps.34.1.11.
8
Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;33(6):461-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.6.461.
9
The United States Supreme Court and mental health law. A retrospective.
Med Law. 1985;4(1):49-54.
10
Decoding right to refuse treatment law.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1993 Winter-Spring;16(1-2):151-77. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(93)90021-6.
引用本文的文献
1
Lost in the shuffle: the influence of patient classification scheme on views about the relationship between refusal of medication and involvement in important hospital-based outcomes.
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Summer;66(2):147-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02238861.
Zotero 插件