El-Baz N M, Kittle C F, Faber L P, Welsher W
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982 Dec;84(6):823-8.
Conventional one-lung intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (OL-IPPV) has been a valuable technique during anesthesia for intrathoracic operations. OL-IPPV has been associated with a high incidence of hypoxemia, as a result of the associated intrapulmonary shunt of 21% to 65% of cardiac output. The administration of OL-IPPV requires the use of a large cuffed endobronchial double-lumen tube. These tubes can be difficult to position properly and have been associated with malfunction, trauma, and tracheobronchial rupture. In an effort to avoid the problems associated with conventional OL-IPPV, we have developed a new technique of modified one-lung high-frequency ventilation (MOL-HFV). MOL-HFV is based on the administration of high-frequency ventilation (HFV) through a small uncuffed endobronchial tube. MOL-HFV was studied in 26 patients during a variety of intrathoracic surgical procedures, and it was compared to one-lung high-frequency ventilation (OL-HFV) and OL-IPPV in each patient. After the chest was opened, each patient received a sequence of OL-IPPV, OL-HFV, and MOL-HFV. Arterial PO2 was measured and intrapulmonary shunting was calculated after 30 minutes of each type of ventilation. This study showed that arterial PO2 was significantly higher during MOL-HFV (mean 379 mm Hg) than during OL-HFV (mean 235 mm HG) or OL-IPPV (mean 141 mm Hg). This was the result of a significantly lower intrapulmonary shunt during MOL-HFV (19%). We conclude that MOL-HFV through a small uncuffed endobronchial tube provides better oxygenation, optimal surgical access, and avoids the problems associated with the use of double-lumen tubes.
传统的单肺间歇性正压通气(OL-IPPV)一直是胸内手术麻醉期间一项有价值的技术。由于心输出量的21%至65%出现肺内分流,OL-IPPV与低氧血症的高发生率相关。实施OL-IPPV需要使用大号带套囊的支气管内双腔导管。这些导管可能难以正确定位,并且与故障、创伤及气管支气管破裂有关。为了避免与传统OL-IPPV相关的问题,我们开发了一种改良的单肺高频通气(MOL-HFV)新技术。MOL-HFV基于通过一根小号无套囊支气管内导管进行高频通气(HFV)。在26例患者进行各种胸内外科手术期间对MOL-HFV进行了研究,并在每位患者中将其与单肺高频通气(OL-HFV)和OL-IPPV进行比较。打开胸腔后,每位患者依次接受OL-IPPV、OL-HFV和MOL-HFV。在每种通气方式通气30分钟后测量动脉血氧分压(PO2)并计算肺内分流。本研究表明,MOL-HFV期间的动脉PO2(平均379 mmHg)显著高于OL-HFV(平均235 mmHg)或OL-IPPV(平均141 mmHg)期间。这是因为MOL-HFV期间的肺内分流显著更低(19%)。我们得出结论,通过小号无套囊支气管内导管进行的MOL-HFV能提供更好的氧合、最佳的手术视野,并避免了与使用双腔导管相关的问题。