Suppr超能文献

[产业工人的听力障碍:1976年至1980年期间在罗兹职业医学研究所听力实验室观察到的病例的临床分析]

[Hearing disorders in industrial workers: clinical analysis of the cases observed in the audiological laboratory of the Lódź Institute of Occupational Medicine during the years 1976-1980].

作者信息

Sułkowski W, Kowalska S

出版信息

Med Pr. 1982;33(1-3):65-79.

PMID:7144544
Abstract

The documentation of 697 cases with suspected, as suggested by regional health service units, occupational aetiology, was analysed. Within consultation those cases underwent complex audiological evaluation at the Laboratory of Audiology, using following examinations: pure tone threshold and suprathreshold audiometry, malingering tests, speech audiometry and electronystagmographic tests. The findings revealed that only 30% of subjects confirmed noise-induced hearing loss. 65.2% of those subjects exhibited cochlear localization, whereas in the remaining 34.8% the results of audiological tests showed retrocochlear impairment. The calculated mean hearing losses were characterized by symmetrical changes both in the right and left ear, as well as by directly proportional dependence on subjects' duration and exposure and age, men having more advanced hearing loss than women, despite identical mean parameters of age and exposure of both sexes. In 70% cases hearing losses were not regarded as occupational diseases, which resulted from: functional disturbances found in form of aggravation and simulation (15.3%), the presence of hearing loss lesser than the one specified by the certification rule (15.1%), post--inflammatory and adhesional changes in the middle ear (12.3%) and lack of significant exposure to noise (8.3%). It has been settled that the major causes of the diagnostic errors that we had detected were: deficient audiometric apparatus, erroneous technics of hearing measurements (among others--without masking), lack of the determination of hearing thresholds for bone conduction, drawing conclusions from single examinations, giving up simulating tests, improper evaluation of the data on occupational exposure. The considerations summing up the results of analysis include an optimum methodology of audiological studies, required standard conditions of audiometry and principles of differential diagnostics as indispensable elements of proper certification procedures in setting up the hearing impairments etiology in industrial workers.

摘要

对地区卫生服务单位建议的697例疑似职业病因的病例资料进行了分析。在会诊期间,这些病例在听力学实验室接受了综合听力学评估,采用了以下检查:纯音阈值和阈上听力测定、诈病测试、言语听力测定和眼震电图测试。结果显示,只有30%的受试者确诊为噪声性听力损失。其中65.2%的受试者表现为耳蜗定位,而其余34.8%的听力学测试结果显示为蜗后损害。计算得出的平均听力损失表现为左右耳对称变化,以及与受试者的暴露时长和年龄直接成正比,尽管男女的平均年龄和暴露参数相同,但男性的听力损失比女性更严重。在70%的病例中,听力损失未被视为职业病,原因如下:以加重和伪装形式出现的功能障碍(15.3%)、听力损失低于认证规则规定的程度(15.1%)、中耳的炎症后和粘连性变化(12.3%)以及缺乏显著的噪声暴露(8.3%)。已确定我们检测到的诊断错误的主要原因是:听力测量仪器不足、听力测量技术错误(包括未掩蔽等)、未测定骨导听力阈值、仅凭单次检查得出结论、放弃伪装测试、对职业暴露数据评估不当。总结分析结果的思考包括听力学研究的最佳方法、听力测定所需的标准条件以及鉴别诊断原则,这些是确定产业工人听力损伤病因的正确认证程序中不可或缺的要素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验