Nishio A, Eguchi M, Ogata K
Orthop Clin North Am. 1982 Oct;13(4):843-56.
Pain relief is the most striking feature following this procedure. In Group I, in which the metal acetabular socket and the metal femoral cup were used, 60 per cent of the patients gained satisfactory pain relief at five to nine years of follow-up. In Group II, in which the metal-polyethylene socket and the metal cup were used, 84 per cent of the patients gained satisfactory pain relief, with 1 to 5 years of follow-up. There have been 12 revision cases in the 130 hips operated on, with the average time to revision being 3 years and 10 months. Revision procedures consisted of the conventional total hip replacement (seven cases), replacement of the socket and/or the cup (four cases), and arthrodesis (one case). The secondary operations could be performed without difficulties, probably because no bone cement was used in our surface replacement. No cases of pulmonary embolism, thrombophlebitis, deep infection, heterotopic ossification, or femoral neck fracture were encountered after the procedure.
疼痛缓解是该手术后最显著的特征。在第一组中,使用了金属髋臼杯和金属股骨杯,60%的患者在随访5至9年时获得了满意的疼痛缓解。在第二组中,使用了金属-聚乙烯髋臼杯和金属股骨杯,84%的患者在随访1至5年时获得了满意的疼痛缓解。在接受手术的130例髋关节中,有12例翻修病例,翻修的平均时间为3年10个月。翻修手术包括传统的全髋关节置换术(7例)、髋臼杯和/或股骨杯置换术(4例)以及关节融合术(1例)。二次手术可以顺利进行,这可能是因为我们的表面置换术中未使用骨水泥。术后未出现肺栓塞、血栓性静脉炎、深部感染、异位骨化或股骨颈骨折的病例。