Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Are ultrastructural, biochemical and immunocytochemical studies useful in distinguishing between them?

Endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma represent different points in a disease continuum which may be difficult to distinguish using standard histologic criteria. The role of ancillary biochemical, ultrastructural and immunocytochemical techniques in understanding the normal physiologic responses to hormonal stimuli is briefly considered in order to serve as a basis for an analysis of abnormal proliferative states. Not surprisingly, the ultrastructural and biochemical features of hyperplastic and carcinomatous endometria demonstrate a progressive continuum of abnormalities. The role of the immunohistologic detection of CEA, HCG, Casein, and other markers in distinguishing between the various endometrial diseases is discussed. The endometrium represents one of the more spectacular of endocrine target organs in which marked morphologic and ultrastructural changes occur throughout a women's lifetime. Such changes include those accompanying the menarche and the menopause as well as the extensive remodelling which occurs during the reproductive years. During the latter period, the endometrium cyclically proliferates, undergoes secretory differentiation, regresses, degenerates and regenerates. These regularly occurring changes are distinctive and have been described in histological detail, (Noyes et al., 1950, Noyes, 1973, Dallenbach-Hellweg, 1974), as well as ultrastructurally (Cavazos and Lucas, 1973, Ferenczy and Richart, 1974, Ferenczy, 1977). Morphological studies, coupled with advances in knowledge of steroid biochemistry, have confirmed that the cyclic morphological alterations are under the regulatory role of estrogens and progesterone.