Suppr超能文献

门静脉压力的药物性降低与机械性降低:一项对比研究。

Pharmacological vs. mechanical reduction in portal pressure: a comparative study.

作者信息

Groszmann R J, Blei A T, Storer E H, Conn H O

出版信息

Surgery. 1978 Nov;84(5):679-85.

PMID:715683
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that decreasing blood flow in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) by the infusion of intra-arterial vasopressin into or partial mechanical obstruction of the SMA by a balloon catheter (partial balloon obstruction) causes similar alterations in splanchnic hemodynamics, but divergent changes in systemic hemodynamics. The effects of these two methods of reducing SMA blood flow were compared in each of six anesthetized normal dogs. Vasopressin and partial balloon obstruction induce similar reductions in portal pressure (-54 +/- 12% vs. -46 +/- 11%), wedge hepatic vein pressure (-54 +/- 13% vs. -53 +/- 18%), and portal venous flow (-34 +/- 7% vs. -37 +/- 7%). Significantly different effects between intra-arterial vasopressin and partial balloon obstruction were observed, however, in cardiac output (a decrease of -24 +/- 5% vs. an increase of +12 +/- 4%) (P less than 0.001), heart rate (-8 +/- 3% vs. 0) (P less than 0.05), and systemic vascular resistance (+36 +/- 8% vs. -2 +/- 2%) (P less than 0.005), respectively. These results indicate that the two procedures are equally effective in reducing portal venous pressure and blood flow. Partial balloon obstruction, however, does not induce the potentially deleterious systemic hemodynamic effects seen with vasopressin infusion. In fact, some of the changes observed with partial balloon obstruction, especially the increase in cardiac output, are considered to be beneficial. In an additional five dogs, partial balloon obstruction was maintained for 5 hours. Throughout, the reduction in portal venous pressure (hepatic venous wedge minus hepatic venous free pressure) was maintained at less than half of the baseline levels (4.75 +/- 0.43 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.32 mm Hg), and the mean arterial pressure at baseline values. All of the dogs survived and were well at 1 week after the prolonged partial obstruction. No abnormalities were observed in the anatomical or histological studies of the small intestine. This study suggests that partial balloon obstruction of the SMA has theoretical therapeutic advantages over intra-arterial vasopressin for reducing portal venous pressure.

摘要

先前的研究表明,通过向肠系膜上动脉(SMA)内注入动脉血管加压素或用球囊导管对SMA进行部分机械性阻塞(部分球囊阻塞)来减少SMA血流量,会导致内脏血流动力学出现类似变化,但全身血流动力学变化却有所不同。在六只麻醉状态下的正常犬中,对这两种减少SMA血流量的方法的效果进行了比较。血管加压素和部分球囊阻塞导致门静脉压力(-54±12%对-46±11%)、肝静脉楔压(-54±13%对-53±18%)和门静脉血流量(-34±7%对-37±7%)出现类似程度的降低。然而,动脉内注入血管加压素和部分球囊阻塞在以下方面观察到了显著不同的效果:心输出量(分别降低-24±5%对增加+12±4%)(P<0.001)、心率(-8±3%对0)(P<0.05)以及全身血管阻力(+36±8%对-2±2%)(P<0.005)。这些结果表明,这两种方法在降低门静脉压力和血流量方面同样有效。然而,部分球囊阻塞不会引发注入血管加压素时所见的潜在有害的全身血流动力学效应。事实上,部分球囊阻塞所观察到的一些变化,尤其是心输出量的增加,被认为是有益的。在另外五只犬中,部分球囊阻塞维持了5小时。在此期间,门静脉压力(肝静脉楔压减去肝静脉自由压)的降低维持在基线水平的不到一半(4.75±0.43对2.25±0.32 mmHg),且平均动脉压维持在基线值。所有犬在长时间部分阻塞后1周均存活且状况良好。在小肠的解剖学或组织学研究中未观察到异常。这项研究表明,对于降低门静脉压力,SMA的部分球囊阻塞在理论上比动脉内注入血管加压素具有治疗优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验