• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对低收入糖尿病患者和高血压患者的社区团体项目评估。

The evaluation of a community-based group program for low-income diabetics and hypertensives.

作者信息

Cohen R Y

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 1982 Oct;10(5):527-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00894142.

DOI:10.1007/BF00894142
PMID:7158616
Abstract

Two studies compared the effectiveness of a community-based, behavioral group program versus an individual patient-education program with low-income diabetic and hypertensive patients, respectively. The dependent variables measured patients' knowledge, disease management skills, and clinical outcomes. Patients in the group programs demonstrated greater gains in knowledge and disease management skills than did the control patients. However, there was no clinically significant change in weight, blood pressure, or urinalysis results for any group of patients. The data suggest that group management is an effective mechanism for patient education but is not sufficiently reinforcing to induce change of habits, particularly when there are competing sources of reinforcement within the community.

摘要

两项研究分别比较了基于社区的行为小组项目与针对低收入糖尿病患者和高血压患者的个体患者教育项目的有效性。因变量衡量患者的知识、疾病管理技能和临床结果。小组项目中的患者在知识和疾病管理技能方面比对照组患者有更大的提高。然而,任何一组患者的体重、血压或尿液分析结果都没有出现具有临床意义的变化。数据表明,小组管理是患者教育的一种有效机制,但不足以强化以促使习惯改变,特别是当社区内存在相互竞争的强化源时。

相似文献

1
The evaluation of a community-based group program for low-income diabetics and hypertensives.一项针对低收入糖尿病患者和高血压患者的社区团体项目评估。
Am J Community Psychol. 1982 Oct;10(5):527-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00894142.
2
Community-based interventions in hypertensive patients: a comparison of three health education strategies.高血压患者的社区干预:三种健康教育策略的比较
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 29;15:33. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1401-6.
3
[The significance of guided patient education on the value of metabolic control in a district center for diabetes mellitus].[在一个地区糖尿病中心开展的患者指导教育对代谢控制价值的意义]
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1981 Jul 15;36(14):491-4.
4
Behavior change, weight loss, and physiological improvements in type II diabetic patients.II型糖尿病患者的行为改变、体重减轻及生理改善
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985 Feb;53(1):111-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.1.111.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Approach for Hypertension Control in Low-Income Settings in Argentina: Trial-Based Analysis of the Hypertension Control Program in Argentina.在阿根廷低收入环境下综合控制高血压的成本效益:基于高血压控制项目的分析。
Value Health. 2018 Dec;21(12):1357-1364. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
6
EXPANSION of diabetes education in a United States-Mexico border community (Expanding Services for Patients to Acquire New Skills, Set Goals, and Improve Overall Knowledge).美国-墨西哥边境社区糖尿病教育的拓展(为患者提供拓展服务以获取新技能、设定目标并提升整体知识水平)
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jan-Feb;58(1):30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
7
Evaluation of a multi-faceted diabetes care program including community-based peer educators in Takeo province, Cambodia, 2007-2013.2007 - 2013年在柬埔寨茶胶省对一个多方面的糖尿病护理项目进行评估,该项目包括社区同伴教育者。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 25;12(9):e0181582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181582. eCollection 2017.
8
[Modification of the risk profile of obese essential hypertensive patients by the group "hypertension discussion" program].["高血压讨论" 项目组对肥胖原发性高血压患者风险状况的改善]
Soz Praventivmed. 1988;33(1):46-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02084006.
9
A diabetes control program in a public health care setting.公共卫生保健环境中的糖尿病控制项目。
Public Health Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;108(5):595-605.
10
Patient exposition and provider explanation in routine interviews and hypertensive patients' blood pressure control.常规访谈中的患者暴露与医生解释以及高血压患者的血压控制
Health Psychol. 1987;6(1):29-42. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.6.1.29.