Chessick R D
Am J Psychother. 1982 Oct;36(4):438-49. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1982.36.4.438.
Seven current critical areas in intensive psychotherapy are discussed. (1) Social polemics, centering around the conflict between the humanistic and individualizing thrust of intensive psychotherapy, and the dehumanization of our current dark age; (2) training, where the resident is caught in a dilemma between techniques stressing fast relief and the possibilities of longer intensive therapy that stand in stark contrast to these techniques; (3) fundamental philosophical choices on the part of every practitioner that various types of therapy require; (4) delineation of intensive psychotherapy primarily defined as a modified form of psychoanalysis; (5) establishing the methodology of psychoanalysis and its derivative discipline, intensive psychotherapy; (6) use of intensive psychotherapy as the treatment of choice for pre-Oedipal disorders, severe character disorders, borderline patients, and certain others, such as some schizophrenic patients; (7) the collision between certain irreconcilable views such as those of Kohut and Kernberg that forces further choices on the therapist. This latter unresolved area could be placed in perspective by appeal to ego psychology which, as in the work of Blanck and Blanck, and others, is still a viable alternative and forms a critical area of investigation.
本文讨论了强化心理治疗当前的七个关键领域。(1)社会论战,其核心围绕强化心理治疗中人文主义和个体化倾向与当前黑暗时代的非人性化之间的冲突;(2)培训,住院医生在强调快速缓解的技术与与这些技术形成鲜明对比的更长时间强化治疗可能性之间陷入两难境地;(3)每位从业者对于不同类型治疗所需的基本哲学选择;(4)强化心理治疗的界定,其主要被定义为精神分析的一种改良形式;(5)确立精神分析及其衍生学科强化心理治疗的方法;(6)将强化心理治疗用作治疗前俄狄浦斯期障碍、严重人格障碍、边缘型患者以及某些其他患者(如一些精神分裂症患者)的首选治疗方法;(7)某些不可调和的观点之间的冲突,如科胡特和克恩伯格的观点,这迫使治疗师做出进一步选择。通过诉诸自我心理学,这一尚未解决的领域可以得到正确看待,正如布兰克和布兰克等人的著作中所表明的,自我心理学仍然是一种可行的选择,并且构成一个关键的研究领域。