Smialowicz C R
Clin Ther. 1982;5(2):113-9.
This report describes a single-blind, comparative evaluation of cefaclor and tetracycline therapy for acute episodes of bacterial bronchitis due to Hemophilus influenzae or Streptococcus pneumoniae. One therapeutic failure occurred in the 25 patients receiving cefaclor, and four occurred in the 26 patients receiving tetracycline. The latter failures were due to tetracycline-resistant organisms. Sputum cultures yielded 39 isolates of S pneumoniae and 11 of H influenzae. None of the isolates were resistant to cefaclor. In contrast, the incidence of resistance to tetracycline was 38% (18 of 48 isolates). All of the nine isolates of H influenzae tested were resistant to tetracycline; five of 11 H influenzae isolates were resistant to ampicillin, four of four were resistant to erythromycin, and five strains were resistant to multiple agents. These findings suggest that traditional therapy of bacterial bronchitis may be unsatisfactory in a substantial proportion of patients. The high cure rate and the absence of resistance found in the present study indicate that cefaclor is preferable to tetracycline in the treatment of bacterial bronchitis.
本报告描述了头孢克洛和四环素治疗由流感嗜血杆菌或肺炎链球菌引起的细菌性支气管炎急性发作的单盲比较评估。接受头孢克洛治疗的25例患者中有1例治疗失败,接受四环素治疗的26例患者中有4例治疗失败。后者的治疗失败是由于对四环素耐药的微生物。痰培养分离出39株肺炎链球菌和11株流感嗜血杆菌。所有分离株均对头孢克洛敏感。相比之下,对四环素的耐药率为38%(48株分离株中的18株)。所有检测的9株流感嗜血杆菌均对四环素耐药;11株流感嗜血杆菌分离株中有5株对氨苄西林耐药,4株对红霉素耐药,5株对多种药物耐药。这些发现表明,在相当一部分患者中,细菌性支气管炎的传统治疗可能并不理想。本研究中发现的高治愈率和无耐药性表明,在治疗细菌性支气管炎方面,头孢克洛比四环素更可取。