Suppr超能文献

关于临床试验中分层随机分配与完全随机分配的说明。

A note on stratifying versus complete random assignment in clinical trials.

作者信息

Grizzle J E

出版信息

Control Clin Trials. 1982 Dec;3(4):365-8. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(82)90026-5.

Abstract

The efficiency of stratifying on a risk factor before randomization as opposed to complete randomization and adjustment for the risk factor by post-randomization analysis is examined by calculating the variance of the estimated difference between two treatment means for the two design strategies. This analysis shows that in small samples relying on post-randomization stratification can lead to significant loss in efficiency when compared to prerandomization stratification. In moderate and large samples the two design strategies should have similar variances.

摘要

通过计算两种设计策略下两个治疗均值估计差异的方差,来检验在随机分组前根据风险因素进行分层与完全随机分组并在随机分组后对风险因素进行调整相比的效率。该分析表明,在小样本中,与随机分组前分层相比,依赖随机分组后分层会导致效率显著损失。在中等样本和大样本中,两种设计策略的方差应相近。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验