Humes L E, Ochs M G
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Dec;25(4):528-35. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2504.528.
In the first portion of this study, the effects of two levels of contralateral masking on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) were investigated in 10 normal-hearing subjects. No significant changes were observed in the mean latency-intensity functions or the mean amplitude-intensity functions of this group of subjects when noise of various levels was added to the nontest ear. In the second portion of this study, ABRs were also recorded from the poorer ear of four subjects with a profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Results from the latter group revealed a crossed-over wave V in all cases when the stimulus was delivered to the poorer ear and the nontest (better) ear was not masked. Contralateral masking obliterated this "crossed ABR" in all four unilaterally impaired subjects. These results provide support for the use of contralateral masking when recording from the poorer ear of subjects having asymmetrical hearing loss.
在本研究的第一部分,对10名听力正常的受试者,研究了两种对侧掩蔽水平对听觉脑干反应(ABR)的影响。当向非测试耳添加不同水平的噪声时,该组受试者的平均潜伏期-强度函数或平均振幅-强度函数未观察到显著变化。在本研究的第二部分,还记录了4名单侧重度感音神经性听力损失受试者较差耳的ABR。后一组的结果显示,当刺激传递到较差耳且非测试(较好)耳未掩蔽时,所有病例均出现交叉的V波。对侧掩蔽消除了所有4名单侧听力受损受试者的这种“交叉ABR”。这些结果为在记录不对称听力损失受试者较差耳的反应时使用对侧掩蔽提供了支持。