Lesinski S G
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1982 Nov;15(4):795-811.
The use of a homograft tympanic membrane with an attached malleus has provided an excellent alternative for reconstructing the severely damaged middle ear. I have limited homograft tympanoplasty to four specific indications: previous failure of standard tympanoplasty techniques, high risk of failure (total perforation, absent malleus, slag burns), reconstruction of radical mastoidectomy, and congenital aural atresia. Homograft tympanoplasty has provided a 94 per cent incidence of anatomic success in these severely damaged middle ears. Closure of the air-bone gap to within 25 dB. was accomplished in 85 per cent of these patients. Complications must be viewed in the perspective of the extensive disease in the middle ear that was being reconstructed. Only meticulous attention to surgical technique and postoperative care will provide the successes described by Wehrs, Marquet, Perkins, and others. The otologic surgeon is urged to observe the surgical techniques of homograft tympanoplasty rather than merely read about it. I believe that the transplant tympanic membrane should be used only when it provides an advantage over standard grafting techniques. Underlay fascia tympanoplasty yields excellent results in the majority of eardrum reconstructions. A final word about homograft tympanic membrane and ossicles. Although several "banks" for ear tissue are available in the United States, there are few established guidelines that these banks are required to follow. The otologic surgeon who uses homograft tissue must be guaranteed that the biologic product he is implanting in his patient is sterile, is anatomically perfect, has been stored in a chemically stable preservative, and has proven biologic effectiveness. Ear banks should be managed by surgeons who are using that tissue in their own patients, thus monitoring the tissue's quality. Each bank has a responsibility to donors, recipients, and surgeons to maintain the highest laboratory standards that will guarantee the quality of its product. Since there is no regulating agency, the practicing physician should insist that these standards for processed homograft ear tissue be maintained.
使用带附着锤骨的同种异体鼓膜为重建严重受损的中耳提供了极佳的替代方法。我将同种异体鼓膜成形术限制在四个特定适应症:标准鼓膜成形术技术先前失败、失败风险高(全穿孔、锤骨缺失、熔渣烧伤)、根治性乳突切除术的重建以及先天性耳道闭锁。同种异体鼓膜成形术在这些严重受损的中耳中实现了解剖学成功的发生率为94%。85%的这些患者实现了气骨间隙缩小至25分贝以内。并发症必须从正在重建的中耳广泛疾病的角度来看待。只有对手术技术和术后护理给予细致关注,才能取得韦尔斯、马尔凯、珀金斯等人所描述的成功。强烈敦促耳科外科医生观察同种异体鼓膜成形术的手术技术,而不仅仅是阅读相关内容。我认为,只有当移植鼓膜比标准移植技术具有优势时才应使用。在大多数鼓膜重建中,衬里筋膜鼓膜成形术能产生极佳的效果。关于同种异体鼓膜和听小骨的最后一点。尽管美国有几个耳组织“库”,但这些库几乎没有既定的遵循指南。使用同种异体组织的耳科外科医生必须确保他植入患者体内的生物制品是无菌的、解剖结构完美的、已储存在化学稳定的防腐剂中且已证明具有生物学有效性。耳库应由在自己患者中使用该组织的外科医生管理,从而监测组织质量。每个库都有责任对捐赠者、接受者和外科医生维持最高的实验室标准,以确保其产品质量。由于没有监管机构,执业医师应坚持维持这些处理过的同种异体耳组织的标准。